I am not disputing this. Seems like it could be bad data, bad methods etc. but but based on the data provided in the table it is giving us a number of 127 to work with. The table states that "Data on pregnancy loss are based on based on 827 participants in the v safe registry." if 700 of these 827 joined the study in the third trimester as stated, that gives us 127 to work with. 127/104=81%...

I wish I could figure out how to post a screen shot--can anyone help?

I am not disputing this. Seems like it could be bad data, bad methods etc. but but based on the data provided in the table it is giving us a number of 127 to work with. The table states that "Data on pregnancy loss are based on based on 827 participants in the v safe registry." if 700 of these 827 joined the study in the third trimester as stated the gives us 127 to work with. 127/104=81%...

I wish I could figure out how to post a screen shot--can anyone help?

I am not disputing this. Seems like it could be bad data, bad methods etc. but but based on the data provided in the table it is giving us a number of 127 to work with. The table states that "Data on pregnancy loss are based on based on 827 participants in the vsafe registry." if 700 of these 827 joined the study in the third trimester as stated the gives us 129 to work with. 129/104=81%...

I wish I could figure out how to post a screen shot--can anyone help?