What's wrong with sugar in US?

In Russia, antisugar propaganda massively appeared only in mid-2000 and mostly based on different WHO guidelines and other crap. The only real harm of sugar known to Russians before that campaign was potential harm to the teeth via the acids produced from sugar by bacteria on the teeth but this could be easily avoided. And there is one proverb - "be careful with too much dessert - your ass could stick together". And that's all.

Sugar is a natural part of most fruits and vegetables. Russian cuisine uses sugar widely, we even have whole bunch of highly popular products mostly made from sugar, something like jam, but it is usually whole berries or sliced fruits mixed into sugar and then, after some juice soak into sugar that mix is boiled. That named "varenie". It was used for centuries to preserve the crop of fruils and berries. You will not find a Russian who don't like it. Thousand years ago, before the sugar manufacturing was established, honey, evaporated birch and beet juice with high sugar content used as substitute.

The only difference between sugars in US and Russia appears to be that US sugar is mostly cane sourced, Russia one is from beet. Chemically they differ in isotope of carbon, cane sugar have higher С13/C12 isotope ratio than beet sugar.

Basically, sugar is main source of glucose in blood which is literally fuel for the brain. Healthy man could consume sugar without limitations and any side effects. Sugar substitutes does not provide necessary amount of glucose, even fructose have much lower conversion efficiency. Sugar is just combined fructose and glucose, and it can't pass to the blood in whole. So there can't be any cocaine-like addiction. Only lack of glucose necessary to the brain when you deprive the body the source of it. It is a literal fraud to pass the brain starvation as "addiction". That way they will name hunger and need for oxygen as "harmful addiction" soon.

I find it highly suspicious, when whole groups of usual products declared "harmful" now by the same group of people connected with big pharma and swindlers like WHO. There are already "harmful" meat, potato, sugar, salt, wheat derivatives, dairy including cheese, and all that they recommend to exclude from your diet. What else they declare "harmful", and what they suggest as replacement? Synthetic garbage? Insects? Green soylent?

What's wrong with sugar in US?

In Russia, antisugar propaganda massively appeared only in mid-2000 and mostly based on different WHO guidelines and other crap. The only real harm of sugar known to Russians before that campaign was potential harm to the teeth via the acids produced from sugar by bacteria on the teeth but this could be easily avoided. And there is one proverb - "be careful with too much dessert - your ass could stick together". And that's all.

Sugar is a natural part of most fruits and vegetables. Russian cuisine uses sugar widely, we even have whole bunch of highly popular products mostly made from sugar, something like jam, but it is usually whole berries or sliced fruits mixed into sugar and then, after some juice soak into sugar that mix is boiled. That named "varenie". It was used for centuries to preserve the crop of fruils and berries. You will not find a Russian who don't like it. Thousand years ago, before the sugar manufacturing was established, honey, evaporated birch and beet juice with high sugar content used as substitute.

The only difference between sugars in US and Russia appears to be that US sugar is mostly cane sourced, Russia one is from beet. Chemically they differ in isotope of carbon, cane sugar have higher С13 isotope content than beet sugar.

Basically, sugar is main source of glucose in blood which is literally fuel for the brain. Healthy man could consume sugar without limitations and any side effects. Sugar substitutes does not provide necessary amount of glucose, even fructose have much lower conversion efficiency. Sugar is just combined fructose and glucose, and it can't pass to the blood in whole. So there can't be any cocaine-like addiction. Only lack of glucose necessary to the brain when you deprive the body the source of it. It is a literal fraud to pass the brain starvation as "addiction". That way they will name hunger and need for oxygen as "harmful addiction" soon.

I find it highly suspicious, when whole groups of usual products declared "harmful" now by the same group of people connected with big pharma and swindlers like WHO. There are already "harmful" meat, potato, sugar, salt, wheat derivatives, dairy including cheese, and all that they recommend to exclude from your diet. What else they declare "harmful", and what they suggest as replacement? Synthetic garbage? Insects? Green soylent?

What's wrong with sugar in US?

In Russia, antisugar propaganda massively appeared only in mid-2000 and mostly based on different WHO guidelines and other crap. The only real harm of sugar known to Russians before that campaign was potential harm to the teeth via the acids produced from sugar by bacteria on the teeth but this could be easily avoided. And there is one proverb - "be careful with too much dessert - your ass could stick together". And that's all.

Sugar is a natural part of most fruits and vegetables. Russian cuisine uses sugar widely, we even have whole bunch of highly popular products mostly made from sugar, something like jam, but it is usually whole berries or sliced fruits mixed into sugar and then, after some juice soak into sugar that mix is boiled. That named "varenie". It was used for centuries to preserve the crop of fruils and berries. You will not find a Russian who don't like it. Thousand years ago, before the sugar manufacturing was established, honey, evaporated birch and beet juice with high sugar content used as substitute.

The only difference between sugars in US and Russia appears to be that US sugar is mostly cane sourced, Russia one is from beet. Chemically they differ in isotope of carbon, cane sugar have mostly С13 isotope, beet sugar have C12.

Basically, sugar is main source of glucose in blood which is literally fuel for the brain. Healthy man could consume sugar without limitations and any side effects. Sugar substitutes does not provide necessary amount of glucose, even fructose have much lower conversion efficiency. Sugar is just combined fructose and glucose, and it can't pass to the blood in whole. So there can't be any cocaine-like addiction. Only lack of glucose necessary to the brain when you deprive the body the source of it. It is a literal fraud to pass the brain starvation as "addiction". That way they will name hunger and need for oxygen as "harmful addiction" soon.

I find it highly suspicious, when whole groups of usual products declared "harmful" now by the same group of people connected with big pharma and swindlers like WHO. There are already "harmful" meat, potato, sugar, salt, wheat derivatives, dairy including cheese, and all that they recommend to exclude from your diet. What else they declare "harmful", and what they suggest as replacement? Synthetic garbage? Insects? Green soylent?

What's wrong with sugar in US?

In Russia, antisugar propaganda massively appeared only in mid-2000 and mostly based on different WHO guidelines and other crap. The only real harm of sugar known to Russians before that campaign was potential harm to the teeth via the acids produced from sugar by bacteria on the teeth but this could be easily avoided. And there is one proverb - "be careful with too much dessert - your ass could stick together". And that's all.

Sugar is a natural part of most fruits and vegetables. Russian cuisine uses sugar widely, we even have whole bunch of highly popular products mostly made from sugar, something like jam, but it is usually whole berries or sliced fruits mixed into sugar and then, after some juice soak into sugar that mix is boiled. That named "varenie". It was used for centuries to preserve the crop of fruils and berries. You will not find a Russian who don't like it. Thousand years ago, before the sugar manufacturing was established, honey, evaporated birch and beet juice with high sugar content used as substitute.

The only difference between sugars in US and Russia appears to be that US sugar is mostly cane sourced, Russia one is from beet. Chemically they differ in isotope of carbon, cane sugar have mostly С13 isotope, beet sugar have C12.

Basically, sugar is main source of glucose in blood which is literally fuel for the brain. Healthy man could consume sugar without limitations and any side effects. Sugar substitutes does not provide necessary amount of glucose, even fructose have much lower conversion efficiency. Sugar is just combined fructose and glucose, and it can't pass to the blood in whole. So there can't be any cocaine-like addiction. Only lack of glucose necessary to the brain when you deprive the body the source of it. It is a literal fraud to pass the brain starvation as "addiction". That way they will name hunger and need for oxygen as "harmful addiction" soon.

I find it highly suspicious, when whole groups of usual products declared "harmful" now by the same group of people connected with big pharma and swindlers like WHO. There is already "harmful" meat, potato, sugar, salt, wheat derivatives, dairy including cheese you have to exclude from your diet. What else they declare "harmful", and what they suggest as replacement? Synthetic garbage? Insects? Green soylent?