You’ve given me a simple denial yet you have no logical explanation for that denial. Let me show you why:

For years, the same arguments used to dismiss UFO witnesses are the exact same arguments that people are using to dismiss the thousands of Bigfoot witnesses every single year.

1. A person who claims to have a UFO or Bigfoot experience is not an expert witness and therefore they probably saw a bear or a shooting star.

2. A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot is lying in order to get attention or perhaps to write a book and earn money.

3. A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot has no hard evidence, all they have is an anecdotal story of their experience.

4. If the person has some physical evidence, that evidence is either of very poor quality (blurry photo or video) or they probably fabricated the evidence.

Again, these WERE the typical arguments used to dismiss 100% of UFO witnesses. These arguments ARE still being used to dismiss 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.

So, the fact that the US government is admitting that they don’t know what UFOs are is evidence that some of the people who witnessed the similar objects in the past we’re not lying.

Let me give you another chance to answer the question. Despite the fact that the US government is now bringing out information about UFOs do you believe that each and every non-military witness from the past was lying?

Yes or no?

If yes, then did the UFOs only arrive to earth about 10 years ago and have they only revealed themselves to the military? Is that what you believe?

If no, then you are admitting that some of the witnesses from the past did see unidentified flying objects of unknown origin. They were not lying or mistaken.

So now I want you to explain why we should believe some of the UFO witnesses but we should not believe any of the Bigfoot witnesses.

I want you to come up with a specific logical argument or explanation for why only 100% of Bigfoot witnesses are wrong or lying.

I’ve given you four typical arguments that people use. But if you can’t use those arguments against 100% of UFO witnesses then you can’t use those arguments against 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.

You’ve given me a simple denial yet you have no logical explanation for that denial. Let me show you why:

For years, the same arguments used to dismiss UFO witnesses are the exact same arguments that people are using to dismiss the thousands of Bigfoot witnesses every single year.

1. A person who claims to have a UFO or Bigfoot experience is not an expert witness and therefore they probably saw a bear or a shooting star.

2. A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot is lying in order to get attention or perhaps to write a book and earn money.

3. A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot has no hard evidence, all they have is an anecdotal story of their experience.

4. If the person has some physical evidence, that evidence is either of very poor quality (blurry photo or video) or they probably fabricated the evidence.

Again, these are the typical arguments used to dismiss 100% of UFO witnesses. They are still being used to dismiss 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.

So, the fact that the US government is admitting that they don’t know what UFOs are is evidence that some of the people who witnessed the similar objects in the past we’re not lying.

Let me give you another chance to answer the question. Despite the fact that the US government is now bringing out information about UFOs do you believe that each and every non-military witness from the past was lying?

Yes or no?

If yes, then did the UFOs only arrive to earth about 10 years ago and have they only revealed themselves to the military? Is that what you believe?

If no, then you are admitting that some of the witnesses from the past did see unidentified flying objects of unknown origin. They were not lying or mistaken.

So now I want you to explain why we should believe some of the UFO witnesses but we should not believe any of the Bigfoot witnesses.

I want you to come up with a specific logical argument or explanation for why only 100% of Bigfoot witnesses are wrong or lying.

I’ve given you four typical arguments that people use. But if you can’t use those arguments against 100% of UFO witnesses then you can’t use those arguments against 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.

You’ve given me a simple denial yet you have no logical explanation for that denial. Let me show you why.

The same arguments used to dismiss UFO witnesses, for years, are the exact same arguments that people are using to dismiss the thousands of Bigfoot witnesses every single year.

1. A person who claims to have a UFO or Bigfoot experience is not an expert witness and therefore they probably saw a bear or a shooting star.

2. A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot is lying in order to get attention or perhaps to write a book and earn money.

3. A person who claims to see a UFO or a Bigfoot has no hard evidence, all they have is an anecdotal story of their experience.

4. If the person has some physical evidence, that evidence is either of very poor quality (blurry photo or video) or they probably fabricated the evidence.

Again, these are the typical arguments used to dismiss 100% of UFO witnesses. They are still being used to dismiss 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.

Again, the fact that the US government is admitting that they don’t know what UFOs are is evidence that some of the people who witnessed the similar objects in the past we’re not lying.

Let me give you another chance to answer the question. Despite the fact that the US government is now bringing out information about UFOs do you believe that each and every non-military witness from the past was lying?

Yes or no?

If yes, then did the UFOs only arrive to earth about 10 years ago and have they only revealed themselves to the military? Is that what you believe?

If no, then you are admitting that some of the witnesses from the past did see unidentified flying objects of unknown origin. They were not lying or mistaken.

So now I want you to explain why we should believe some of the UFO witnesses but we should not believe any of the Bigfoot witnesses.

I want you to come up with a specific logical argument or explanation for why only 100% of Bigfoot witnesses are wrong or lying.

I’ve given you four typical arguments that people use. But if you can’t use those arguments against 100% of UFO witnesses then you can’t use those arguments against 100% of Bigfoot witnesses.