Everyone wants the truth. What is the truth. The truth is there is a sworn in president. If this changes, there isn't the former president. The chain of command is the president, then the vice president, then the house speaker. If the election was invalid, it means a new election except hypothetically you are without an acting president. In which case the senate is the ruling power until there is a lawful president. Otherwise it is a military coup. But it isn't the former president. He isn't in office. He wasn't sworn in as acting president. He has a claim, sure, it is invalid. Doesn't validating it mean changing the constitution. Wouldn't it have to create a new ammendment? Who has that power when there is an acting president, vetoing?

What is that truth? Isn't it easier to obscure. Because America already has a president.

Who knows how this turns out, we all are speculating. My guess no where else. Shamefully. What's done is done and cannot be undone. By undoing things break burn and crumble.

Everyone wants the truth. What is the truth. The truth is there is a sworn in president. If this changes, there isn't the former president. The chain of command is the president then the vice president, then the house speaker. If the election was invalid, it means a new election except hypothetically you are without an acting president. In which case the senate is the ruling power until there is a lawful president. Otherwise it is a military coup. But it isn't the former president. He isn't in office. He wasn't sworn in as acting president. He has a claim, sure, it is invalid. Doesn't validating it mean changing the constitution. Wouldn't it have to create a new ammendment? Who has that power when there is an acting president, vetoing?

What is that truth? Isn't it easier to obscure. Because America already has a president.

Who knows how this turns out, we all are speculating. My guess no where else. Shamefully. What's done is done and cannot be undone. By undoing things break burn and crumble.