I agree it was misleading to use "inject" in that context.

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment as designed gives us no clue one way or the other.

Therefore, the experiment cannot provide us with any information to help us speculate about vaccine damage! You should leave it up though, because discussions like these are useful.

I agree it was misleading to use "inject" in that context.

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment as designed gives us no clue one way or the other.

Therefore, the experiment can't provide us with any information that can help us speculate about vaccine damage! You should leave it up though, because discussions like these are useful.

I agree it was misleading to use "inject" in that context.

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment cannot say one way or the other because it is fundamentally flawed.

Therefore, the experiment can't provide us with any information that can help us speculate about vaccine damage! You should leave it up though, because discussions like these are useful.

I agree it was misleading to use "inject" in that context.

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment cannot say one way or the other because it is fundamentally flawed.

Therefore, the experiment can't provide us with any information that can help us speculate about vaccine damage!

I agree with the inoculate/inject confusion.

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment cannot say one way or the other because it is fundamentally flawed.

Therefore, the experiment can't provide us with any information that can help us speculate about vaccine damage!

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment cannot say one way or the other because it is fundamentally flawed.

Therefore, the experiment can't provide us with any information that can help us speculate about vaccine damage!

This post is about how the inoculation of hamsters with Sars Cov 2 has the same side effects as the inoculation of humans with Sars Cov 2 even though the means of inoculation are slightly different.

As I understand it, these "vaccines" don't even contain the "virus". Or at least, the Moderna and Pfizer ones don't. They say they're using mrna to have body cells produce the viral spike protein. They're not challenging the immune system with viral particles directly like they used to.

So if they're not culturing anything, it's hard to imagine how this experiment and an mrna vaccine mediums would overlap. Even though the symptoms appear to be matching, it's possible to create the same collection of symptoms with different poisons. For example, if I test two different poisons that compromise blood cells I would expect to see tissue oxygen deprivation, degraded function, and associated lesions in both instances.

Basically, they've given poison to a hamster to create systemic damage. They then use the PCR test at 40 cycles to generate a false positive for sars-cov-2 in whatever part of the body they want to test. They can now point and say, "look at all the damage Covid caused!".

What about the vaccine symptoms then? Do the vaccine and this experiment use the same poisons? Who knows! Manufactures are not divulging their methods. Is that poison the sars-cov-2 particle? This experiment cannot say one way or the other because it is fundamentally flawed.

Therefore, this doesn't provide us with any useful information that can help us speculate about vaccine damage!