Thanks again. I think it has more servicing is that angle. Always an angle. It needs the extracted products. Yes at the same time it offers some environmental benefits. Although it still has nuclear waste.

Coal emits true. But it emits less than the woodchip burners creating electricity off incineration all over America, being sold as renewable and green because they recycle scrap wood. But they aren't only burning the wood, they're burning paint, some are burning rubber chips off tires. Wood burning is far more emitting than coal, green wood wet wood sap and lichen. The oxymoron is largely in the mining of coal, but mining uranium is an ugly business. Copper mining is very bad for the environment and so is almost all mining especially rare earth minerals and gems, stripping mining, and the toxic run off created from metals like copper etc. Strangely nobody complains about cooking, it is super emitting. But they will use biofuel, ethanol, it is worse than diesel and is thicker. Nevermind the impact of growing sugar cane or plants turned into ethanol just to burn as it emits twice as much. Diesel was less. Until somebody profited more off recycling for even more emissions.

EVs have almost nothing to do with the environment they're simply the next upgrade costing you more. What they don't emit out of their exhaust they emit in their consumption. Their ridiculously expendable lifetimes. Everything electric breaks quicker. Nobody can repair it either, because it is cheaper just to buy a new one. As we are left with mountains of ewaste putting plastic, acids, and batteries and toxic alloys everywhere. More plastic and ewaste in electrics. Now they control you completely, it is all on the same source, inflation, hacked and monitored. Sure they offer hydrogen as well. It is astronomically more expensive and the hydrogen fuel cells deplete much quicker than EV batteries. Like they need servicing every so many refills. EV batteries lasting about 7 years. Well not when you recharge them more and more because everything and your robot dog is plugged into your car.

Thanks again. I think it has more servicing is that angle. Always an angle. It needs the extracted products. Yes at the same time it offers some environmental benefits. Although it still has nuclear waste.

Coal emits true. But it emits less than the woodchip burners creating electricity off incineration all over America, being sold as renewable and green because they recycle scrap wood. But they aren't only burning the wood, they're burning paint, stoneware burning rubber chips off tires. Wood burning is far more emitting than coal, green wood wet wood sap and lichen. The oxymoron is in the mining of coal, but mining uranium is an ugly business. Copper mining is very bad for the environment and so is almost all mining especially rare earth minerals and gems, stripping mining, and the toxic run off created from metals like copper etc. Strangely nobody complains about cooking, it is super emitting. But they will use biofuel, ethanol, it is worse than diesel and is thicker. Nevermind the impact of growing sugar cane or plants turned into ethanol just to burn as it emits twice as much. Diesel was less. Until somebody profited more off recycling for even more emissions.

EVs have almost nothing to do with the environment they're simply the next upgrade costing you more. What they don't emit out of their exhaust they emit in their consumption. Their ridiculously expendable lifetimes. Everything electric breaks quicker. Nobody can repair it either, because it is cheaper just to buy a new one. As we are left with mountains of ewaste putting plastic, acids, and batteries and toxic alloys everywhere. More plastic and ewaste in electrics. Now they control you completely, it is all on the same source, inflation, hacked and monitored. Sure they offer hydrogen as well. It is astronomically more expensive and the hydrogen fuel cells deplete much quicker than EV batteries. Like they need servicing every so many refills. EV batteries lasting about 7 years. Well not when you recharge them more and more because everything and your robot dog is plugged into your car.

Thanks again. I think it has more servicing is that angle. Always an angle. It needs the extracted products. Yes at the same time it offers some environmental benefits. Although it still has nuclear waste.

Coal emits true. But it emits less than the woodchip burners creating electricity off incineration all over America, being sold as renewable and green because they recycle scrap wood. But they aren't only burning the wood, they're burning paint, stoneware burning rubber chips off tires. Wood burning is far more emitting than coal, green wood wet wood sap and lichen. The oxymoron is in the mining of coal, but mining uranium is an ugly business. Copper mining is very bad for the environment and so is almost all mining especially rare earth minerals and gems, stripping mining, and the toxic run off created from metals like copper etc. Strangely nobody complains about cooking, it is super emitting. But they will use biofuel, ethanol, it is worse than diesel and is thicker. Nevermind the impact of growing sugar cane or plants turned into ethanol just to burn as it emits twice as much. Diesel was less. Until somebody profited more off recycling for even more emissions.

EVs have almost nothing to do with the environment they're simply the next upgrade costing you more. What they don't emit out of their exhaust they emit in their consumption. Their ridiculously expendable lifetimes. Everything electric breaks quicker. Nobody can repair it either, because it is cheaper just to buy a new one. As we are left with mountains of ewaste putting plastic, acids, and batteries and toxic alloys everywhere. More plastic and ewaste in electrics. Now they control you completely, it is all on the same source, inflation, hacked and monitored. Sure they offer hydrogen as well it is astronomically more expensive and the hydrogen fuel cells deplete much quicker than EV batteries. EV batteries lasting about 7 years. Well not when you recharge them more and more because everything and your robot dog is plugged into your car.

Thanks again. I think it has more servicing is that angle. Always an angle. It needs the extracted products. Yes at the same time it offers some environmental benefits. Although it still has nuclear waste.

Coal emits true. But it emits less than the woodchip burners creating electricity off incineration all over America, being sold as renewable and green because they recycle scrap wood. But they aren't only burning the wood, they're burning paint, stoneware burning rubber chips off tires. Wood burning is far more emitting than coal, green wood wet wood sap and lichen. The oxymoron is in the mining of coal, but mining uranium is an ugly business. Copper mining is very bad for the environment and so is almost all mining especially rare earth minerals and gems, stripping mining, and the toxic run off created from metals like copper etc. Strangely nobody complains about cooking, it is super emitting. But they will use biofuel, ethanol, it is worse than diesel and is thicker. Nevermind the impact of growing sugar cane or plants turned into ethanol just to burn as it emits twice as much. Diesel was less. Until somebody profited more off recycling for even more emissions.

EVs have almost nothing to do with the environment they're simply the next upgrade costing you more. What they don't emit out of their exhaust they emit in their consumption. Their ridiculously expendable lifetimes. Everything electric breaks quicker. Nobody can repair it either, because it is cheaper just to buy a new one. As we are left with mountains of ewaste putting plastic, acids, and batteries and toxic alloys everywhere. More plastic and ewaste in electrics.

Thanks again. I think it has more servicing is that angle. Always an angle. It needs the extracted products. Yes at the same time it offers some environmental benefits. Although it still has nuclear waste.

Coal emits true. But it emits less than the woodchip burners creating electricity off incineration all over America, being sold as renewable and green because they recycle scrap wood. But they aren't only burning the wood. Wood burning is far more emitting than coal. The oxymoron is in the mining, mining uranium is an ugly business. Copper mining is very bad for the environment and so is almost all mining especially rare earth minerals and gems, stripping mining, and the toxic run off created from metals like copper etc. Strangely nobody complains about cooking, it is super emitting. But they will use biofuel, ethanol, it is worse than diesel and is thicker. Nevermind the impact of growing sugar cane or plants turned into ethanol just to burn as it emits twice as much. Diesel was less. Until somebody profited more off recycling for even more emissions.

EVs have almost nothing to do with the environment they're simply the next upgrade costing you more. What they don't emit out of their exhaust they emit in their consumption. Their ridiculously expendable lifetimes. Everything electric breaks quicker. Nobody can repair it either, because it is cheaper just to buy a new one. As we are left with mountains of ewaste putting plastic, acids, and batteries and toxic alloys everywhere. More plastic and ewaste in electrics.