The logical fallacy in some of the argument here is: "Some sciences have flaws, therefore all science must be condemned." Just because some liberals have invaded climate science does not mean all climate science is bad, nor that all science is bad. Calling science monolithic and implying it is universally in error is an invalid argument. Also, all science is not a monolithic cult.

Added: I see this thread's been invaded by liberals using the kind of critical race theory logic that says math is racist because it was created by old white males.

The logical fallacy in some of the argument here is: "Some sciences have flaws, therefore all science must be condemned." Just because some liberals have invaded climate science does not mean all climate science is bad, nor that all science is bad. Calling science monolithic and implying it is universally in error is an invalid argument. Also, all science is not a monolithic cult.

Added: I see this thread's been invaded by liberals using the kind of logic that says math is racist because it was created by old white males.

The logical fallacy in some of the argument here is: "Some sciences have flaws, therefore all science must be condemned." Just because some liberals have invaded climate science does not mean all climate science is bad, nor that all science is bad. Calling science monolithic and implying it is universally in error is an invalid argument. Also, all science is not a monolithic cult.

Added: I see this thread's been invaded by liberals.

The logical fallacy in some of the argument here is: "Some sciences have flaws, therefore all science must be condemned." Just because some liberals have invaded climate science does not mean all climate science is bad, nor that all science is bad. Calling science monolithic and implying it is universally in error is an invalid argument. Also, all science is not a monolithic cult.