Reason: None provided.
....because it is easier to prove that election laws were violated, and done in a unconstitutional way, and that you need audits to prove fraud. And if you have a case actually accepted, you can use that as a vehicle to talk about fraud.
[edit: the Texas case that like half the states signed onto did deal with fraud]
You, sir, are a shitty Socrates.
3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original
....because it is easier to prove that election laws were violated, and done in a unconstitutional way, and that you need audits to prove fraud. And if you have a case actually accepted, you can use that as a vehicle to talk about fraud.
You, sir, are a shitty Socrates.
3 years ago
1 score