u/the_1n-Betweener and u/PutinLovesCats I have basically the same response so no point posting twice:

This would be voluntary, and its only enforcement mechanism would be users “rewarding” posters who do give context with more “benefit of the doubt” in terms of good faith engagement with the posts

As an example, compare the quality of these two shill posts:

https://conspiracies.win/p/11SKGdGCw9/wrong-number-go-up/c/

https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRCGqkHw/jungian-analysis-of-last-nights-/c/

The added context leads to infinitely more potential for discussion, regardless of the poster’s actual intent

u/the_1n-Betweener and u/PutinLovesCats I have basically the same response so no point posting twice:

This would be voluntary, and its only enforcement mechanism would be users “rewarding” posters who do give context with more “benefit of the doubt” in terms of good faith engagement with the posts