Thank you for the link, currently watching it. Biggest issue I'm noticing is that the assumed perspective of gravitational direction is totally off. It's attempting to project a flat-earth model of gravitational direction to a spherical body of mass (south pole always being "down", and where everything should be "falling off" the earth). Stopping to consider the gravitational direction of a spherical body of mass (one as large as a planet anyway), the "down" direction is always towards the center of the planet, whereas "up" is always away from the center of the planet. All things that are affected by gravity (such as water) would form a "spherical shell" around a spherical planet in this particular model of gravity. Still watching.

Edit: Finished watching. The biggest (and most glaring) issue I see is that there is no singular, all-inclusive "Flat Earth Model" which simultaneously explains all "Flat Earth Phenomenon". Seasons, daylight cycles, astrology, cyclonic weather patterns, eclipses, etc. There is no comprehensive "Flat Earth Model", inasmuch as I have seen. But if you can find one, please let me know.

Thank you for the link, currently watching it.

Biggest issue I'm noticing is that the assumed perspective of gravitational direction is totally off. It's attempting to project a flat-earth model of gravitational direction to a spherical body of mass (south pole always being "down", and where everything should be "falling off" the earth).

Stopping to consider the gravitational direction of a spherical body of mass (one as large as a planet anyway), the "down" direction is always towards the center of the planet, whereas "up" is always away from the center of the planet. All things that are affected by gravity (such as water) would form a "spherical shell" around a spherical planet in this particular model of gravity.

Still watching.