1000s of sworn affidavits, statistical analysis by professional mathematicians, video evidence of votes being counted without proper oversight, counties that counted more than double the votes than they have legal age voters, and dominion machines being connected to the Internet when they weren't supposed to be. If that's not substantial, I don't know what is.

Also, what you or I consider substantial is moot. My point is that the judges never made a ruling on the evidence.

1000s of sworn affidavits, statistical analysis by professional mathematicians, video evidence of votes being counted without proper oversight, counties that counted more than double the votes than they have legal age voters, and dominion machines being connected to the Internet when they weren't supposed to be. If that's not substantial, I don't know what is.