Can anyone explain this?
(www.newsweek.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
They put these drugs IN the tea?
The tea naturally contains these "undeclared drugs?" (GOD! PAGING GOD!)
Is this some kind of way to pass extremely expensive drugs bought from elsewhere to people who need it i.e.Dallas Buyers Club?
Maybe I'm just fucking stupid. It makes zero sense to me like it's a completely made up story.
There's an article that suggests that diclofenac might be used in constructed wetlands to improve efficiency. So depending on what's in the tea maybe it gets uptaken by plants and stored in the leaves?
This is interesting for sure. Thanks. It's definitely a dot, but still doesn't make any sense of the article itself. To me it sounds like there are very specific non-psychoactive meds in the tea. Like it was a transport method. Like things "aren't for human consumption" but....are? Sort of.. I have no concrete answer and that's why I was wondering what you guys took from this cryptic article.
Moral of the story is don't ingest shit when you don't know where it's from or how it's processed. Most people here alrrady seem to get that for food and water. I don't know why tea would be surprising (also tea leaves tend to hold onto the fluoride that's in the water you use on the plants).
If you want tea, organically grow a camillia bush and some herbs.
I read the article and supposed this already. It's just super fucking weird and really unclear. Even you agree to this above :
I get the feeling the people bought this tea to have these substances.