This video by Rich Hall is old. He and Andrew Johnson did further research and no longer fully support much of the theories put forward by Simon Shack / September Clues. In fact most of what Shack says in those films has been completely dismissed by both Rich and Andrew as demonstrable lies and knowing ignorance by Shack.
For example Rich did an analysis of the radar information later and determined the info matches the path of both planes, and the "ball" follows the trajectory of the plane radar too. There of course remains the possibility that the planes are not what they seem, The ball thing has not been explained. But this is not proven by September Clues at all. Live Chroma Key effects were not used on live tv on 9/11 to cover up a "ball". See the videos on this channel about September Clues for detailed debunking:
In fact it is believed by some of these guys that Simon Shack was a paid disinfo operator, due to his fathers connection to the UN and his repeated ignorance of communications that showed his theories to be bunk.
It has been demonstrated that Simon Shack uses creative editing to remove shots or cut them short, which contradict and thus disprove the theory he is propounding on screen. There is convincing analysis of the "nose out" footage, using photographs from other angles, that the "nose" is actually explosive ejaculation from the opposite side of the building. Please look at Mark Conlon's channel above and also Rich Planets website, specifically ALL his 9/11 videos.
Also Andrew Johnsons website - neither Andrew or Rich support Simon Shack any more and have determined him to be a liar, unserious researcher or even a disinfo plant:
Working out what really happened has been a difficult journey for most honest researchers. This is because there are as many "muddle up merchants" operating in 9/11 research as there are genuine truth seekers. The muddle up merchants have been trying to discredit all of the video footage, some of which provides clues to what really happened. Evidence that passenger jet planes were used in any of the four attacks is slim to non existent. Today Richard is joined by Mark Conlon and Andrew Johnson who dispel some of the dis-information and hence get closer to the truth on the 9/11 plane issue.
This video by Rich Hall is old. He and Andrew Johnson did further research and no longer fully support much of the theories put forward by Simon Shack / September Clues. In fact most of what Shack says in those films has been completely dismissed by both Rich and Andrew as demonstrable lies and knowing ignorance by Shack.
For example Rich did an analysis of the radar information later and determined the info matches the path of both planes, and the "ball" follows the trajectory of the plane radar too. There of course remains the possibility that the planes are not what they seem, The ball thing has not been explained. But this is not proven by September Clues at all. Live Chroma Key effects were not used on live tv on 9/11 to cover up a "ball". See the videos on this channel about September Clues for detailed debunking:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7lgjW62bk5h9/
In fact it is believed by some of these guys that Simon Shack was a paid disinfo operator, due to his fathers connection to the UN and his repeated ignorance of communications that showed his theories to be bunk.
It has been demonstrated that Simon Shack uses creative editing to remove shots or cut them short, which contradict and thus disprove the theory he is propounding on screen. There is convincing analysis of the "nose out" footage, using photographs from other angles, that the "nose" is actually explosive ejaculation from the opposite side of the building. Please look at Mark Conlon's channel above and also Rich Planets website, specifically ALL his 9/11 videos.
Also Andrew Johnsons website - neither Andrew or Rich support Simon Shack any more and have determined him to be a liar, unserious researcher or even a disinfo plant:
https://www.richplanet.net/
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre_menu.php?gen=3
An explanation about why the 9/11 video and radar analysis was undertaken
Rich explains the further research he did - using radar info - after OP's video. VERY IMPORTANT TO WATCH THIS.
9/11 disinfo and lack of evidence of planes