Published 12 years ago:
Harvard Magazine - Jan/Feb 2011: RIGHT NOW | MAN AND MACHINE - Virus-Sized Transistors
Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber and his colleagues used nanowires to create a transistor so small that it can be used to enter and probe cells without disrupting the intracellular machinery. These nanoscale semiconductor switches could even be used to enable two-way communication with individual cells.
Lieber has worked for the past decade on the design and synthesis of nanoscale parts that will enable him to build tiny electronic devices (which means the tech has been around for 20+ years).
Arrested in mid-January 2020:
NY Post 1.28.2020: Harvard professor charged for lying about $1.5M Chinese research scheme
Charles Lieber is accused of receiving more than $1.5 million to establish a lab and do research at Wuhan University, according to prosecutors, who said he was paid hundreds of thousands more over several years
According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD).
Obviously it’s all a coincidence that this researcher who developed viral nanomachines and was paid $15M by the DOD/NIH just happened to be arrested for colluding with WUT within 10 days of the first case of Wuhan coronavirus dropping in the USA.
Nothing to see here, folks.
I wonder how many were injected with nanobots.
I wonder how to turn them off.
Can you short them out? Neutralize them?
It would be terribly easy to control people with something like this. Could this have something to do with the personality changes some have reported in their friends and family?
You could control people by sending messages to them -- they could essentially have a radio in their bodies.
They would do things thinking their ideas were their own.
Hmm. Interesting.
Much to ponder.
Ivermectin seems to be effective.
I'm pretty sure terrain theory doesn't apply to nanotechnology.
Perhaps read the article. It was explained that the tech he worked on was "virus-sized" (for context), not that it dealt with viruses. This particular tech seems to deal with nanowires that can probe inside cells to extract and relay metadata of sorts.
Given the fact that no one can seem to supply a viable sample of the SARS-CoV-2 for testing (which would support the terrain theory), is it not possible that what is said to be a virus is actually nanotech? Is it also not outside the realm of possibility that nanoparticulates might be aerolized and injested in the same way it's claimed that viruses are?
Oh, I agree. I'm also not opposed to the theory that SARS-CoV-2 was completely synthetic all along, and nothing but nanotech.
So what are you implying?
That further investigation is warranted and reasonable.