Does anyone have thoughts on the fallout of the J&J vaccine since it is not mRNA? I know it still causes your cells to produce spike protein. My sister and sister in law both took it despite repeated warnings from me not to do so. Unfortunately they both have rule following personalities that don't handle conflict well.
J&J and the AZ vaccines use adenovirus shells to inject DNA sequences into your cells. Those DNA sequences instruct the cells to create spike proteins.
Some of the mechanisms would be different, for example, LINE1 can encode RNA into the host cell’s DNA. I imagine that might not work for DNA, but there is probably another mechanism.
I expect all of the spike sequence producing vaxxines are effectively the same.
We know that regular, natural viruses can get encoded into a cell's DNA. There is evidence of this throughout the human genome, so it happens, sometimes in somatic cells resulting in altered eggs and sperm--thus preserved in dependents' genomes.
So yea, I'm sure it can happen. We just don't know how often or easily. This is the sort of thing that clinical trials were supposed to discover.
Does anyone have thoughts on the fallout of the J&J vaccine since it is not mRNA? I know it still causes your cells to produce spike protein. My sister and sister in law both took it despite repeated warnings from me not to do so. Unfortunately they both have rule following personalities that don't handle conflict well.
J&J and the AZ vaccines use adenovirus shells to inject DNA sequences into your cells. Those DNA sequences instruct the cells to create spike proteins.
Some of the mechanisms would be different, for example, LINE1 can encode RNA into the host cell’s DNA. I imagine that might not work for DNA, but there is probably another mechanism.
I expect all of the spike sequence producing vaxxines are effectively the same.
So you think it's possible AZ and JJ are also altering cells DNA to produce spike protein perpetually?
We know that regular, natural viruses can get encoded into a cell's DNA. There is evidence of this throughout the human genome, so it happens, sometimes in somatic cells resulting in altered eggs and sperm--thus preserved in dependents' genomes.
So yea, I'm sure it can happen. We just don't know how often or easily. This is the sort of thing that clinical trials were supposed to discover.
So are they trying to slide something into the "collective genome" if you will?