Thanks to u/Forefather for the winning suggestion, the text of which was as follows:
Definitely the staged shootings. We need to find the critical details that expose the obvious false flags so well that even Normie retards will agree. Like the easy one regarding the poor 18 year olds always having 8 to 10 thousand dollars worth of guns ammo and gear. Etc etc
I'll kick it off. There's a common phrase used in the media after the fact:
"The shooter was known to the FBI"
If they were known, why was no attempt made to deradicalize or stop them?
Also, why do some shootings get coverage and others don't?
Good point. The coverage is usually for known shooters from what I see.
Financially, it would be nice if there was at least evidence of maxxed out credit cards and some source of income to account for the amount.
Its hard to save that kind of cash
Perhaps the FBI is less reactionary...while they have their tentacles knee deep into everything, they may be more passive than active. Most of the time they just help the local P.D. deal with stuff they can't handle, like a serial swatter.
I want to give them the benefit of the doubt and, for the most part believe that the agents have genuinely good intentions. But, the leadership has clearly become partisan