Keep in mind, the No WMDs WAS the narrative after the fact. Pay no attention that the US had sold Iraq WMDs to use against Iran, that Saddam had used gas on the Kurds AND SHOT SCUDS into Saudi Arabia and ISRAEL at the beginning of the war, AND WikiLeaks revealed that Mustard Gas was found.
The goalposts of WMDs shifted to fit the narrative. The media was selling war on the pretext of nuclear weapons. SCUDs do not cause "mass destruction", they're ordinance no different from Tomahawks.
Keep in mind, the No WMDs WAS the narrative after the fact. Pay no attention that the US had sold Iraq WMDs to use against Iran, that Saddam had used gas on the Kurds AND SHOT SCUDS into Saudi Arabia and ISRAEL at the beginning of the war, AND WikiLeaks revealed that Mustard Gas was found.
Iraq HAD WMDs.
The goalposts of WMDs shifted to fit the narrative. The media was selling war on the pretext of nuclear weapons. SCUDs do not cause "mass destruction", they're ordinance no different from Tomahawks.
They're on the official UN weapons list as WMDs and so are Tomahawks.
That's what moving the goalposts means, numbnuts. Just like how "vaccine" got redefined such that vitamin D qualifies as a vaccine now.
YOU'RE the one redefining a WMD into "ordinances", DUMBFUCK!