The Donetsk and Lugansk regions might beg to differ. Combat there has been practically continuous since 2014 if not earlier, led by actual self-described Neo-Nazis (namely the Azov Battalion), more than eager to purge any ethnic Russians (y'know, white people) they can get their hands on.
In that regard, considering how happy the EU was to give them any weapons it could, I'm really starting to think at least part of the operation involves a sting-type setup for the Brussels bastards.
As in, the EU & co. were duped into supporting and arming literal Nazis, and enabling further atrocities with their usual biased attitude toward the events, so when this comes to light, they'll have no leg to stand on for any moral accusation they might have toward Russia, China, or whoever else one might think of. Is that "based" enough?
"...non-aggressive..."
The Donetsk and Lugansk regions might beg to differ. Combat there has been practically continuous since 2014 if not earlier, led by actual self-described Neo-Nazis (namely the Azov Battalion), more than eager to purge any ethnic Russians (y'know, white people) they can get their hands on.
In that regard, considering how happy the EU was to give them any weapons it could, I'm really starting to think at least part of the operation involves a sting-type setup for the Brussels bastards.
As in, the EU & co. were duped into supporting and arming literal Nazis, and enabling further atrocities with their usual biased attitude toward the events, so when this comes to light, they'll have no leg to stand on for any moral accusation they might have toward Russia, China, or whoever else one might think of. Is that "based" enough?