Yes and it is being largely ignored. I already posted about it here and on reddit and on saidit a couple of days ago. Its been like posting in a ghost town.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
Quote: Joseph Goebbels
...Guess who funded the Nazis to work out things like that....
there are tonnes of docos out there on the financial truth of WW1 and WW2. There are also tonnes of sites. Just use a decent search engine and you'll find it
Typical government in action: give them a complete manual to follow (1984) and they just skimmed through it without reading the details.
When you're changing history you're not supposed to tell the people, you idiots. Then there's actual documented proof. That's double plusbad and improper memory-holing technique.
Yes it looks like they color coded it so yellow must be the original numbers. As long as this data is out there it should be fairly easy to prove if the replacement data is fake or not by comparing the seroprevalence of those diseases in other populations in those years. If the numbers in other populations are similar to the numbers reported in the original data we know this is a cover-up.
Gets me thinking, in my day to day life, would I notice half the population dead and gone? The narrative can't hold up forever. If the shot really wiped out most who gave in, and the hospitals still ran cover for their masters, how many people would need to die before you really started noticing a difference in your day to day life?
Guess it would honestly take us seeing dead bodies piled up on the streets.
Well there are huge numbers of job openings. I don't think it's a short term culling. Even worse data we say suggests something like 3%. Even so that's quite an economic shock esp. when you add in retiring boomers
as soon as the rna starts to work inside the bodies in the long term, you are going to see a lot of people starting to have issues with their hearts, blood, brains, and go on disability etc
And all they really need to limit lifespan is the over specification of IgG response since this will cause chronic illness and inflammation which will cause immunosenescence
in a city of millions of people, you wouldn't even notice 200,000 or so gone over a span of months tbh. it would take A LOT of people to be gone. just in my area. there are a TOONNNN of people, northwest suburbs of chicago. they would need to off about 500,000 or more for people to even START noticing o.o
this is one of the sketchiest moves in the entire covid fiasco, and that's saying something.
Seriously. This is worse than most the stuff in the media because:
Yes and it is being largely ignored. I already posted about it here and on reddit and on saidit a couple of days ago. Its been like posting in a ghost town.
Src/https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jan/31/instagram-posts/numbers-were-based-faulty-data-military-spokespers/
Seems like they altered the data to fit the narrative
Senator Ron Johnson wrote an open letter about the original numbers it to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin so you can see the whole thing is on record.
https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/2/sen-johnson-to-secretary-austin-has-dod-seen-an-increase-in-medical-diagnoses-among-military-personnel
Yes absolutely it should be audited and seroprevalence of those health issues need to be compared with other populations. Download the spreadsheet data. https://renz-law.com/wp-content/uploads/Renz-Law-DMED-Data.xlsx
https://renz-law.com/
This website has the info. Its the website of Thomas Renz the lawyer representing the 3 whistleblowers who named themselves.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." Quote: Joseph Goebbels
...Guess who funded the Nazis to work out things like that....
I have heard that the nazis might have been financed by international banksters... but never read anything good on it...
do you have any books that mention this? articles are good too
there are tonnes of docos out there on the financial truth of WW1 and WW2. There are also tonnes of sites. Just use a decent search engine and you'll find it
Typical government in action: give them a complete manual to follow (1984) and they just skimmed through it without reading the details.
When you're changing history you're not supposed to tell the people, you idiots. Then there's actual documented proof. That's double plusbad and improper memory-holing technique.
Download the spreadsheet dataset here. This has the original data and the replacement data. We may need this later on.
https://renz-law.com/wp-content/uploads/Renz-Law-DMED-Data.xlsx
Nice find
Yes it looks like they color coded it so yellow must be the original numbers. As long as this data is out there it should be fairly easy to prove if the replacement data is fake or not by comparing the seroprevalence of those diseases in other populations in those years. If the numbers in other populations are similar to the numbers reported in the original data we know this is a cover-up.
Gets me thinking, in my day to day life, would I notice half the population dead and gone? The narrative can't hold up forever. If the shot really wiped out most who gave in, and the hospitals still ran cover for their masters, how many people would need to die before you really started noticing a difference in your day to day life?
Guess it would honestly take us seeing dead bodies piled up on the streets.
Well there are huge numbers of job openings. I don't think it's a short term culling. Even worse data we say suggests something like 3%. Even so that's quite an economic shock esp. when you add in retiring boomers
as soon as the rna starts to work inside the bodies in the long term, you are going to see a lot of people starting to have issues with their hearts, blood, brains, and go on disability etc
And all they really need to limit lifespan is the over specification of IgG response since this will cause chronic illness and inflammation which will cause immunosenescence
in a city of millions of people, you wouldn't even notice 200,000 or so gone over a span of months tbh. it would take A LOT of people to be gone. just in my area. there are a TOONNNN of people, northwest suburbs of chicago. they would need to off about 500,000 or more for people to even START noticing o.o
and that would have to be done ALL at ONCE