The problem is how deep this goes. If Steve Kirsch is not willing to question the holocaust or moon landings, for example, then he will never be open minded enough for this topic.

I keep thinking Harold Hillman may be the best "in" for normies on this topic. Despite him not ever even getting to the question of viruses, he showed how all the techniques used in the "identification" of viruses are fraught with assumption and are not fit for the purposes microbiologists put them to.

He said sub-cellular fractination is too destructive to be used on biological cells, yet it is a core process still used today. He said electron microscopes are simply NOT SUITABLE for examining biological cells. He basically said microbiology since the electron microscope's introduction is basically a write-off.

So it's much bigger than just viruses. We don't know everything there is to know about biological cells at all. And much of what we do "know" is dubious as fuck.

You ask if it is real to plant that question into the heads of sheep. If it is real, then the next question is whether or not it is man-made. If it is man-made, then the next question is about who made it.