Hi Everyone. I should have titled this "Authoritarianism Ends Freedom." I'm not talking about like Soviet era totalitarianism. I notice that my posts get deleted often here (not necessarily this community). I'm not trying to put up stuff that I think is hugely controversial and it certainly isn't leftist. Nor am I a "glowie." I am not a FED. I AM NOT A FEDERAL AGENT nor a state agent, or any kind of agent, foreign or domestic. I'm just somebody that calls things as I see them.
I don't believe in most conspiracies. Not that conspiracies don't happen, of course, they do all the time. But many of these sensational conspiracies I don't buy.
Israel was not behind 9/11. It was not a false flag. An alien space craft did not crash in Roswell and the government is not hiding evidence of alien contact with Earth. Democrats do not drink baby blood (but both Democrats and Republicans could well have been customers of Jeffrey Epstein). Wayfair is not a front for child trafficking. Trump did not conspire with Russia to steal the 2016 election. Biden did not conspire with dozens of state election officials around the country, many of them Republican, to steal the 2020 election.
Some I'm willing to consider: There was a conspiracy to kill Kennedy (but I think Oswald shot him). Reagan conspired with Iran to delay hostage release.
But there is ONE conspiracy that is happening NOW and is a threat to the freedom of every single American.
There is a conspiracy to end democratic rule in the United States. Yes, I know, "we're not a democracy." But we are. We are a Republic, which is to say, a representative democracy. Being a republic and being a democracy are not two different things. Republicanism is just a form of democracy, the only kind of democracy that really works with large populations. That is what we are. That is what the Founders envisioned. We have expanded the idea of democracy that the Founders had, but if we hadn't, many people who extol our freedoms today would not have the right vote under their original vision of democracy.
But around the world, liberal democracy, by which I mean, democracy that is based on individual freedom, is under threat. Many countries are enamored with Russia or Hungary. Why? They are neither powerful nor rich. Their people are not better off than the western liberal democracies and yet for some reason, there seems to be an attraction to these more authoritarian governments where neither individual liberty nor democracy are maintained. Don't take my word for it, check the ratings at Freedom House, a conservative, virulently anti-communist organization.
But even many conservatives are being drawn to the idea of these authoritarian style governments which only have a facade of democratic rule. For example, Tucker Carlson went to Hungary and extolled the virtues of that country's political system. Hungary has a score of 69 out of a hundred, a rating of "Partly Free," with a political rights score of 29/40. The USA is 83 (32/51). Why would he want to look at Hungary as an exemplar? In Hungary, the GOVERNMENT mandates masks for everybody.
The problem is that he's been taken in by a conspiracy to take away the rights of Americans. To end political and civil rights in the United States. Note: in Russia they do NOT have the freedom to bear arms. Hungary's gun laws are much more stringent than those of the USA. Why would these supposed "conservatives" be turning to the likes of Russia or Hungary?
And look, if we keep following people like them down this path, it's a small step to authoritarianism. Do you think you will have more rights under an authoritarian government? If you do, you are living in a world of make-believe. You will NOT be the favorites of these people. Anybody who values independence and freedom will be a direct threat to authoritarian rule. We will have no rights at all.
Please, before this gets deleted, just think about this. I welcome comments below.
I can't imagine him praising China. Do you have a link for that? What do you think about China's suppression of Muslims?
Well....I don't know about this. We'll see what evidence he presents.
We already have a problem. Council of Foreign Relations isn't a secret society.
The Bilderbergers are not a secret society. In fact, they openly promote free market capitalism. Are they part of the power elite? Absolutely, but what they do, they do in the open, not in secret. Are their ideas and thoughts reflected in our mainstream media? Absolutely (watch the Manufacturing Consent video, I posted). In fact, many of the actual journalists (Chris Cuomo, Anderson Cooper, Maggie Haberman, just for some examples) are directly part of the power elite that shape mainstream beliefs. The problem here is that John Coleman acts like this is some kind of secret. It's not.
Trilaterals, supposedly the Trilateral Commission, is not a secret organization. It publishes its membership lists, it regularly publishes studies and what not. Is it part of the Power Elite? Absolutely. Is it on our side? Of course not.
Anyway, you get the picture. He then throws in Bolsheviks who are the exact opposite of Trilaterals and Bilderbergs who work to maintain a capitalist system that makes the wealthy insanely wealthy and the rest of us just scraping by. At least, I'm just scraping by.
I'm only on page 7 of 169 pages and it is full of misinformation and just made up shit. I'll read it, it's fascinating, but I have other things to do right now. I'll pick up when I can. I can't keep commenting on every single thing although I am tempted to. But you have to be careful of stuff like this. There are plenty of expose's of what the US has done around the world, some of them by insiders coming clean, some just by historians. There is no need to claim some sort of uber group pulling the strings. We elect elites who follow the goals and objectives of the Power Elite. You should read "The Power Elite" by C. Wright Mills. There's the conspiracy. No need for secret societies, it's right out in the open.
This isn't what happened. Moro's wife stated that an American official had threatened Moro that if he continued to build ties with the PCI, there would be a price to pay. Moro's wife didn't know the American was Kissinger. Guerzoni confirmed that the person that Moro had met with was Kissinger. Guerzoni did not say that Kissinger was behind the murder of Moro.
But I would not be surprised if Kissinger and the US had some role in the assassination of Moro, as I've said. It would follow a pattern, well-established, of the US opposing politicians who were "soft" on Communism. For example, in Guatemala, Arbenz was overthrown for allowing Communists in his government, even though he himself wasn't a communist. Allende in Chile was murdered. So a threat from Kissinger, clearly could be seen as an actual physical threat or as a political one. But to say that Guerzoni said in sworn testimony that Kissinger was behind the murder is false. That isn't what happened.
EDIT:
Now he has "eliminate" in quotes. The literal quote was, ""either change his political line or pay dearly for it." Nothing about eliminating Moro. Also, Guerzoni only confirmed that it was Kissinger who delivered that message, not what the message was.
So far this is replete with falsehood and unsupported assertions. Do you, @Zap_Powerz have any evidence to support any of these links to secret societies controlling everything behind the scenes?
It's hard to assess this because I don't have his 1982 expose.
Moro was forming a coalition government WITH the Italian Communist Party so this doesn't make sense. But destabilizing the Middle East does make sense.
No, there is no connection between Weishaupt, the Illuminati, and events occurring in Italy in the 1970s.
Evidence? There isn't any. If the US was in any way directly involved in the murder of Moro, it was due to the same US obsession with opposing communism that led to the overthrows of Salvador Allende, Jacobo Arbenz, the obscene support for the mass murder in Indonesia, the Vietnam War, the Korean War, the assassination of Patrice Lumumba, the support for death squads in El Salvador, etc etc. It's about US interests, and specifically, the interests of elite US capitalists. The same capitalists that fund these rightwing groups trying to overthrow US democracy and replace it with Christian Dominionism. And again, read Coleman's introduction, he says it right there.