Flat Earthers hold their belief because they know something's off about the official narrative and it's the closest they've gotten to the truth. It's the most stigmatized and ridiculed theory, not because they believe in a flat earth, but rather the other truths many have uncovered along the way.
(media.communities.win)
Speculation
Flat earthers don't believe what you are showing here. There is no evidence that these other "planets" exist other than Nasa cartoons. If you look for yourself through a telescope all you can see is a circular light.
Many people actually do believe in flat earth because it makes more sense.
This is a just a meme that is commonly used by those who ridicule flat earthers due to the stigma created around it. I have a fairly good idea of many of their beliefs. I did look at some of their primary arguments at one point.
I'm not saying they are wrong to believe that either. Regardless of whether or not the earth is actually flat, the official narrative is almost certainly a lie, so anything is possible.
Fair enough! This is a reasonable position.
FE does not say planets are fake, but rather they are not planets but celestial light bodies revolving around the plane-t earth, you can watch a lot of footage of YT showing the planets as bodies of light, anyhow if you are interested this is a good place to start:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAeBPskvP4Y
Ok they are not fake, but they are also not planets. I don't know exactly what they are so for now I will say they are some kind of star/light.
I don't claim to know exactly what the earth is. However flat earth makes the most sense to me. Most of the issues can be at least partially, if not fully explained. But of course there is always some mystery left.
I'm not sure what you're referring to about the stars. Maybe give a specific example.
If you are at different sides of our Earth north/equator/south you will be able to see certain stars the other can't. Polaris the North Star for example.
Other side will see Australis Polaris the South star. There are also stars which should be visible, but are cut off by line of sight.
The rotation of the stars also reversed when viewing from north and south. Flat Earth has the flat water as their strongest argument.
Water is the key to many secrets within our universe. I should also note the other person I work with decoded the R.Fludd Philisophia image. I would decode that differently, but I haven't gotten around to it yet.
Polaris can also be used as a flat earth argument. It can always be seen from the same spot, which indicates that the earth is motionless.
We cannot see for an infinite distance so not being able to see Polaris from the south doesn't necessarily disprove flat earth.
https://youtu.be/IOSW_LAs67Y
Yes, it makes sense to me. But, again I don't consider myself a Flat Earther, nor do I pretend to know what shape Earth has. But, it's definitely not a spinning ball and we're not rotating around the Sun at 66,600 miles/hour.
From my research looks like heliocentrism was invented and calculated on by Jesuit priests of the Catholic Church. The theories from their front man Nicolaus Copernicus of the Third Order of St. Dominic were supported by Jesuit astronomer Giovanni Battista Riccioli. The other thing I find odd Nicolaus Copernicus, Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were all high rank Freemasons and all occultists.
Much of mainstream science is very confused about so many things, and the intellectuals are far too far up their own asses to admit they are wrong and consider any alternative. They also give the average layman the impression that they understand a lot more than they really do.
Gravity is "proven" every time you drop anything heavy. It clearly exists.
You can measure the momentum of a free-falling mass to "detect" gravity... Just like you can measure the attraction effect of a magnet, or the energy inducted by an electromagnetic antenna, or the vibration of the sound propagating through the air.
No one can detect something that is causing ANY OF THESE FIELD EFFECTS, because there are no particles involved. They are simply effects induced into some medium.
The concept of photons or "virtual particles" was invented by physicists to allow them to fit electromagnetic energy into their existing flawed model, even though no particle has ever been found.
They had to say light is also a wave, because the observed behavior is not consistent with a particle, but a wave isn't a physical thing either, it's an effect induced into some other medium which we are not aware of.
For an engineer, the easiest way to conceptualize what fields really are, is to think of a matrix being traversed outward from the emitter grid cell... Except that each cell of the matrix is in a quantum super-position, so the state is only decided when a given cell is observed.
I never said anything about an invisible force. The misconception of what "forces" really are, is one of the reasons for all the confusion.
Saying there is or isn't an invisible force pulling us down is like saying the same thing about what pushes sound vibrations through the air, or what pulls a magnet towards a pole, or what pushes the information of electromagnetic energy to another point in space... It's ridiculous to say there is an invisible force behind any of these things, because there's no evidence of a "force".
I'm not saying you're wrong either. I'm not making any claims about the shape of the world. All I'm saying is, like most of the scientists who support the mainstream narrative, you are simply making the most sense you can from your observations, based on everything you know about the nature of reality.
It's great that you're asking these kinds of questions. There are a lot more questions you should actually be asking. Such as: What makes clouds form in one place when water rises from a large body of water?
As I learn more about the true quantum nature of reality, and the ways that particles actually interact which very few are willing to even consider, things start to make a lot more sense.
Its turtles all the way down bro.
Your picture is stupid.
That's intended. It's a common meme I've see anti-flat-earthers use to ridicule people, which is very relevant to my theory.
Yeah, that's obvious now. Sorry.
It was one of the first things I noticed on reddit r/conspiracy sub. Anytime there was a post about Flat Earth the shills were out in droves. And the 1st thing they did is post comments early ridiculing anyone who would dare even question the shape of Earth.
One time I commented the polar circles are located near the poles of the Earth, at 66.6° N and S latitude. And that the Earth’s circumference is 600x6x6 nautical miles (or 21,600 nautical miles). I also mentioned that's a strange number, thinking Copernicus, Newton and Einstein were all high-degree Freemasons, and all occultists. I got a massive amount of downvotes
“Planets” are wandering stars. We live on an infinite plain. You can see the big dipper and Polaris in Australia proving we arent on a ball.
To many holes in the flat earth theory.
Most people that claim to be flat earthers are just parroting shit they've seen and haven't given it any thought.
Most critical thinkers that have taken the time to research flat earth and globe theory, see the faulty arguments of both theories, and thus remain skeptical. If you doubt the globe model, or even lean towards it but wish to see proper science, you're labeled a flat earther.
the CONSTANT anti flat earth shills, though not solid proof that the earth is flat, is somewhat indicative it could be flat.
The long distance photos are the biggest thing for me, it's obviously not as told.