Does anyone else think that the death of a high profile fully "vaxxed" individual is going to drastically change the narrative? Or do you think that they'll fall back on "well its just one person. The vax is still safe and highly effective!" Now we have a very public example of the failure of the shot, it seems it will be harder for them to push the narrative in the way they have been. What are your thoughts on how this will effect things?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
What's the narrative, that an 84yo cancer & parkinsons patient who is immunocompromised from his his diseases and their treatments died from a viral infection with a high mortality rate for healthy 84yos? So he was vaccinated. We already know the vaccine doesn't work well, is leaky as shit. The leakiness hasn't changed the narrative and Colin's death won't either.
I didn't necessarily mean change it in a good way. Hell there's already people doubling down on the "he died cuz YOU AREN'T vaccinated" bullshit. Never mind the myeloma. Just feels like it may be at least a pivot point in the narrative, even if for the worse.