I'm going to save the "evidence" for this theory for another thread.
However, these two events have raised my eyebrows and I can't help but consider them in the context of this particular theory I'm exploring atm.
Here I am literally scouring moon crater maps on wikipedia, and Kamala just so happens to rant about "seeing the moon craters up close" in a widely mocked and publicized NASA psa?
And OK I'll admit the Shatner thing is less profound...undoubtedly he would still have had an emotional experience seeing the "regular" blue ball earth.
But...if we live in a crater on a LARGER planet, visiting "space" would actually mean leaving our crater and having a glimpse at the LARGER earth.
Now THAT would make anyone emotional.
Why was NASA infiltrated by Freemasons?
What does the 33 degrees actually represent?
Does that angle have something to do with our crater?
Crater/Creator?
Stay tuned.
NASA faked the moon landing, but flat earth is disinfo bro
What about the lives of the astronauts after though? Were they fooled or have they been lying? Personally I think our government did prepare to fake it, hence the videos and stuff, maybe even faked the broadcast footage but I think we did land.
I think it's possible we landed there after 1969 and had already beat the soviets. To this day only 12 men have even claimed to walk on the moon.
He didn't mention anything about "flat earth" bro.
If what we think is the whole of earth is actually just a crater on a much larger planet, there's no reason why that much larger planet couldn't be round.
What if NASA didn't actually fake the moon landing... What if they just landed outside of the crater, in another area of the larger planet we reside on?
Interesting to see 2 downvotes in this forum on a statement that I think actually might be true!
Very interesting indeed. I've also noticed and been wondering about the downvotes I've seen on a bunch of your posts. What do you think the intention is behind the downvoting?
I'm not sure. It's not consistent/frequent/effective enough for it to be an "op" but they certainly seem to show up only during "uncomfortable" threads. Keep up the good work fren!
This isn't flat earth, this is crater earth.
Some random thoughts I've had so far:
Could the circumference of the planet being much larger explain why the curvature isn't visible at 15 000 feet?
If global dust/mud slides did actually happen -- including in places where the source of the dust can't be explained -- could the dust have come from outside the crater?
I think the floods of yore came from outside the crater.
Also, "atlantis" was another crater that was flooded. The "journey" after the flood was to settle in a new crater.
The "ark" included animals from other craters, sent to seed our own.
There are SO MANY things explained by this theory, I can't even begin to catalog them all.
I'm going to put together a mega thread on this topic very soon.
FTR, I don't think this is the "right" theory, but I have a strong gut feeling that some aspect of it is accurate to a degree.
Now that is really interesting!
I agree, I've only just started to scratch the surface and I can already see a lot about the theory that seems very compelling.
I keep getting distracted by other things though... Which somehow keeps leading me back to the same mental phenomenon. Hope you didn't miss the possible connections I mentioned in the Wetiko thread. I've never been religious, spiritual or believed in anything that couldn't be proven with science, but after finding out that this phenomenon was actually proven with peer reviewed science, I've started to put a lot of things together.