So if anyone still has an open mind about this remember that the people who are promoting vaccination and the other public health measures are trained and experienced, know what they are talking about, and number in the millions globally.
The people who are feeding on and promoting the fear generated by a global pandemic are either selling something and/or working for for foreign governments. They are almost invariably completely untrained in the science, and discredited if they do have any remotely legitimate credentials.
"Malone clarified that he was not discouraging the use of the vaccine but was providing people with as much fair information as he could about their risks."
Malone's argument is about informed consent, not the vaccine.
As for Yeadon I think the failure of his dreams for Ziarco last year knocked a screw loose. He made a pile when he sold the company but Novartis was supposed to bring his baby to market. Instead they wound it down and lost hundreds of millions. Yeadon still had his money but that's around the time he went from being a supporter on Twitter ("Covid 19 is not going away. Until we have a vaccine or herd immunity all that can be done is to slow its spread.”) and (“A vaccine might be along towards the end of 2021, if we’re really lucky.”) to taking his new position. I don't know why he's taking it out on Pfizer.
Don't forget he predicted the death toll in the UK wouldn't reach 40,000. It's now at 130,000. For a n expert his grip is a little shaky.
So if anyone still has an open mind about this remember that the people who are promoting vaccination and the other public health measures are trained and experienced, know what they are talking about, and number in the millions globally.
The people who are feeding on and promoting the fear generated by a global pandemic are either selling something and/or working for for foreign governments. They are almost invariably completely untrained in the science, and discredited if they do have any remotely legitimate credentials.
"Malone clarified that he was not discouraging the use of the vaccine but was providing people with as much fair information as he could about their risks."
https://news.yahoo.com/single-most-qualified-mrna-expert-173600060.html
Malone's argument is about informed consent, not the vaccine.
As for Yeadon I think the failure of his dreams for Ziarco last year knocked a screw loose. He made a pile when he sold the company but Novartis was supposed to bring his baby to market. Instead they wound it down and lost hundreds of millions. Yeadon still had his money but that's around the time he went from being a supporter on Twitter ("Covid 19 is not going away. Until we have a vaccine or herd immunity all that can be done is to slow its spread.”) and (“A vaccine might be along towards the end of 2021, if we’re really lucky.”) to taking his new position. I don't know why he's taking it out on Pfizer.
Don't forget he predicted the death toll in the UK wouldn't reach 40,000. It's now at 130,000. For a n expert his grip is a little shaky.
He fits into the credentialed but discredited category {https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccine-safe-idUSL2N2NX1J6)
Matthew 22:21
I'd say Public Health is Caesar's.