How absurd. As with most modern science it ignores the glaringly obvious problem that if even a handful of people don't have one characteristic but have the other than the study proves nothing. It's like trying to prove gravity exists but you can only demonstrate it working ~60% of the other time; doesn't indicate anything. Science is only useful for learning what will be the case under a given circumstance 100% of the time and then trying to figure out why. Anything else is useless.
How absurd. As with most modern science it ignores the glaringly obvious problem that if even a handful of people don't have one characteristic but have the other than the study proves nothing. It's like trying to prove gravity exists but you can only demonstrate it working ~60% of the other time; doesn't indicate anything. Science is only useful for learning what will be the case under a given circumstance 100% of the time and then trying to figure out why. Anything else is useless.
Additionally, there is no one mentioned in this article that I would trust to rate cognitive ability or intelligence.