Has anyone found a picture of the sarscovid2 that is not an illustration? Trying to redpill my friend.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
The issue is that they take a "picture" (electron micrograph) of some neutceotide gunk from a so-called "infected" sample.
Since they assume the virus must be in among that gunk, when they spot something that looks how they expect the virus to look, they slap a big arrow on that, identifying it as the virus they were looking for.
So they have photos of something, but their "reasoning", that it is the virus they were looking for, is built on a long line of assumptions inherent in the standard techniques used to "isolate" virus.
However there is no solid evidence that that is so. It's all assumption and always has been, even since this process of "isolating" virus was first done in the 1950's. These issues were identified then but ignored for no good reason.
Virologists are taught that this process is infallible and not to question it. But those who have looked into it and questioned it have realised it's far from a solid process.
Basically it is a pseudoscientic process, done without control experiments, and taken on blind faith that this is the way "viruses" are isolated and photographed.
There is simply no way to tell if that "isolated" gunk does or doesn't belong in the body, or if it is pathogenic or harmless. Many believe these things virologists are labelling as "viruses" are actually made by the body itself and not foreign bodies at all.
Anyway, that's the bones of it.
the "spike protein", I assume, is just modeling as well. i'm no virologist, but that's my hunch.
Definitely possible that this spike protein business, which is also a protein vital to pregancy, was the real target in all this and always has been. Like well before the "outbreak". It could have been conceived during the mRNA "vaccine" research that's been going on for years.
It was one of the first things "discovered" early on during the pandemic, even though the virus has ever been isolated, they know for certain about this spike protein?... yeah right.
It scarily easy for them to just arbitrarily say that the presence of this protein incates presence of the virus, and therefore is a good target to focus on, when in reality it's the protein's function in pregnancy is the true target.
There are precisely zero independant people skilled enough with access to equipment and finances who could check and see if this is actually the case. The whole crazy industry is locked down into a hierarchy ruled by those who fund it, not by reason or logic.
I believe some scientists, like Mike Yeadon, suspect this is so but don't say it in so many words for lack of solid proof or fear of being dismissed as crazy conspiracy theorists.
It's just too much of a coincidence that a new vaccine, sponsored by eugenics fanatics like Bill Gates, targets this specific protein that's important to pregnancy.