Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

9
posted 4 years ago by atomical 4 years ago by atomical +9 / -0
30 comments share
30 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (30)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– geneticMessiah 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

The thing that gets to me most is we haven't gone back in decades. There's video of someone from NASA saying we lost the technology needed to do it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– osbornegs 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

NASA Astronaut Don Pettit We Can't Go Back To The Moon.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Treintrientje 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

But it's well written so it reads like a really good novel ;) I agree this is the best book I've read about the moon landings.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– graucho 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Also, amusing. By Dave McGowan.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Chairman_Jao_Bi_Den 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Because the real moon has aliens on it, and they're assholes (I'm not kidding).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– mlitton4 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Wow. Never seen that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– osbornegs 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Capricorn One Peter Hyams began thinking about a film of a space hoax while working on broadcasts of the Apollo missions for CBS. He later reflected regarding the Apollo 11 Moon landing, “There was one event of really enormous importance that had almost no witnesses. And the only verification we have . . . came from a TV camera.”

He later elaborated:

Whenever there was something on the news about a space shuttle, they would cut to a studio in St. Louis where there was a simulation of what was going on. I grew up in the generation where my parents basically believed if it was in the newspaper it was true. That turned out to be bullshit. My generation was brought up to believe television was true, and that was bullshit too. So I was watching these simulations and I wondered what would happen if someone faked a whole story.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– osbornegs 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Clip of Apollo 11 press conference These 'astronots' are MORE than excited about their moon trip. The comments are good.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– osbornegs 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

[KELLY SMITH BUSTED "NASA"S LIE(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQDTlsN5V24) Less than 600 people have actually been to 'space' (nearly zero civilians) in the 50 years of 'space travel'. 'Outer space' is only 50 miles up, but such a difficult challenge apparently. Went to the moon (238,000 miles one way), 50 years ago no sweat, 12 times. Still blowing up millions and millions of dollars of technology without leaving earths atmosphere and 'testing' rockets that blow up regularly. Elon Musk can park a space dummy in an electric car in orbit and take pictures no problem, yet Boeing can't rendezvous with the space station 200 miles up because of a space ship 'clock error'?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Chairman_Jao_Bi_Den 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It's all about hiding the knowledge that would free us from the Cabal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– geneticMessiah 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

This video officially red pilled me on the moon landings. I was skeptical before just because we haven't been back in decades and NASA has given some pretty bullshit excuses for that, but now that I actually watch the landings, holy shit that's some fake and gay. No wonder Apollo 13 was the unlucky one, it was all scripted.

I can see why, too. So much pressure on NASA to beat the commies at science and space travel. So much anticipation built up in the media and by our political leaders to make it happen. Either you make it or you fake it, failure's not an option. But this video takes it from plausible to almost certain that the moon landings were faked.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– King_of_Crazy 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Also dig on Stanley Kubrick producing the moon mission at studios in London. True story.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– King_of_Crazy 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Question? When the lunar module left the surface of the moon, WHO tilted the camera up to keep it in the frame? Did NASA leave an astronaut cinematographer on the moon? Remember motion picture cameras ran 35mm silver oxide film through the gate. No tape, no digital back then. HOW was that accomplished?

Also the slow motion affect of the astronauts movements can be accomplished by speeding up the frames per second through the gate from 24 fps to 30-32 fps.

Just sayin.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

IMO this conspiracy is best tackled by the Kubrick angle. Sure, the van allen radiation belt and all that. But Kubrick was a master of visual "tricks" of the camera. He made the space station in 2001 "spin" before cgi even existed. Lots of interesting technical information to dive into.

The thing is with the story though, the parts that were changed from King's novel. The kid playing on a floor that mimicks kennedy space center, wearing an apollo 11 sweater, "don't go into room 237" and all that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– graucho 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I first woke up to the fake moon landings when I learned about the Van Allen Belts. Even NASA admits we can't get past them with current technology, much less with 60's tech. This really is a prison planet.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Burninator 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
  1. A space race against a cold war rival

  2. no more than a hand calculator

  3. after the usa made it, all other countries abandoned their moon landing missions

  4. no one has been back to the moon since 1975.

  5. The USA was racing to the moon to prove they were superior to the ussr should through up red flags. Sounds like they had a very big inventive to cheat.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kekeveli777 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I was privileged enough to hear buzz aldrin live during a startalk live with NDT. He did mention seeing a UFO on the journey and spoke of free energy theories. Overall, very cool guy and had tons of great stories. I think the mission did happen, but what was broadcasted could have been faked or partially controlled to viewers. Did you also know we brought a freemason flag to the moon??

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy