I don't understand the conspiracy here. They could easily have the data from the lander to create an animation. They admit it is an animation in the upper left hand corner. They wouldn't have cameras that could give an accurate view of the landing. the only images that they show that are from the actual landing are the ones of it just sitting on the surface from the lander. While that could be fake I don't understand how using an animation created of off positional data makes it a conspiracy.
nowhere near comparable to being out in space. Texas is considered a mild environment. Space is an extreme environment. Is that a simple enough comparison for a dipshit like you?
I don't understand the conspiracy here. They could easily have the data from the lander to create an animation. They admit it is an animation in the upper left hand corner. They wouldn't have cameras that could give an accurate view of the landing. the only images that they show that are from the actual landing are the ones of it just sitting on the surface from the lander. While that could be fake I don't understand how using an animation created of off positional data makes it a conspiracy.
Do you think the grainy photos are sketchy?
Do you understand the amount of heat, cold, and radiation something gets exposed to in space?
Do you understand the amount of heat, cold, and radiation something gets exposed to in Texas?
nowhere near comparable to being out in space. Texas is considered a mild environment. Space is an extreme environment. Is that a simple enough comparison for a dipshit like you?