The efficacy rates they give us from the studies are a big lie anyways. They report relative risk reduction or the total number of cases in the control group over the total number of cases in both control and vaccinated groups. That ‘efficacy’ of 95% isn’t true efficacy. The real efficacy is the reduction of risk from taking the vaccine vs not taking it but they don’t report it that way. Besides, no one wants to take a vaccine that’s 1% effective. On top of that, the low Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR) means that your chance of catching and dying is significantly tiny.
The efficacy rates they give us from the studies are a big lie anyways. They report relative risk reduction or the total number of cases in the control group over the total number of cases in both control and vaccinated groups. That ‘efficacy’ of 95% isn’t true efficacy. The real efficacy is the reduction of risk from taking the vaccine vs not taking it but they don’t report it that way. Besides, no one wants to take a vaccine that’s 1% effective. On top of that, the low Infection Fatality Ratio (IFR) means that your chance of catching and dying is significantly tiny.
Russia just reported that their vaccine is 91% effective.
Maybe we should seitch to theirs.
What do you think?
Is that 91% effective ontop of the 99.98% survival rate?