Because Dominion definitely won’t be expecting that? It’ll just a big surprise to them when it gets to court?
If there ever was evidence, it’ll be long gone. If there was never any evidence to the contrary, people won’t accept it and claim Dominion deleted it/covered it all up anyway
Qtards will claim that this is a ruse by genius Giuliani to "expose the evidence for voter fraud" during the trial when in fact, he will either try to settle or get utterly crushed.
Afterwards, Qtards will claim that the judges, lawyers, PAs and probably Giuliani himself were all part of the Deep State.
That was an equal protections case. Don't lash out because you're too much of a simpleton to differentiate between lawsuits. There were also multiple legislative hearings held by the states in question where hundreds of witnesses swore under oath with accounts of fraud. I think you're just a retarded faggot.
Dominion can sue because it can claim it was “hacked” by a 3rd party. Remember them burning paperwork on top of that building in Houston?
Because Dominion definitely won’t be expecting that? It’ll just a big surprise to them when it gets to court?
If there ever was evidence, it’ll be long gone. If there was never any evidence to the contrary, people won’t accept it and claim Dominion deleted it/covered it all up anyway
Prediction:
Qtards will claim that this is a ruse by genius Giuliani to "expose the evidence for voter fraud" during the trial when in fact, he will either try to settle or get utterly crushed.
Afterwards, Qtards will claim that the judges, lawyers, PAs and probably Giuliani himself were all part of the Deep State.
Mark my words.
tbf people have been saying Giuliani is deep state since 2001
and many, many Trumpists have believed his ridiculous claims about election fraud.
The witnesses claimed there was fraud. Get your head out of your ass dude, jesus christ.
which witnesses?
Trump's lawsuits didn't c!aim that there was fraud.
in court, Trump's lawyer specifically denied that they were arguing that there was fraud.
any explanation for that?
That was an equal protections case. Don't lash out because you're too much of a simpleton to differentiate between lawsuits. There were also multiple legislative hearings held by the states in question where hundreds of witnesses swore under oath with accounts of fraud. I think you're just a retarded faggot.
If everything goes the way it has for the last 100 years, your prediction will be right.
Many people are pinning their hopes on the unlikely possibility that it isn’t.
Evidence was not presented in the state lawsuits, so maybe something will come to light here. Maybe.