It is completely FALSE to say the concerns over the election "has been looked at in every single state." In fact, not a single state will publish the ballots (as promised by @GaSecofState) & not a single state will allow party-observers to independently confirm signature matches. - Conspiracies

It is completely FALSE to say the concerns over the election "has been looked at in every single state." In fact, not a single state will publish the ballots (as promised by @GaSecofState) & not a single state will allow party-observers to independently confirm signature matches. (nitter.net)

posted 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +87 / -2

9 comments

9 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (9)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– ButAtLeastWeDontHave 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

if you want people thinking, tell them that there is equal hard evidence that Trump won as there is evidence that an election even happened and we didn't experience mass hallucination.

If you memory hole all of the evidence that the election even happened just so that Trump can't investigate, then I get to fairly say "I have yet to see evidence of a widespread election."

permalink save report block reply