We have been postulating here for a while that the cold storage constraints on the Pfizer vaccine probably was going to be used to say perhaps a portion of the batches were faulty/degraded in transportation.
Isn't it also lovely that they are basically in bed with the big pharma and essentially giving them the benefit of the doubt so readily and being so accommodating.
Also 78% integrity in the RNA payload sounds like an absolutely terrible path to a catastrophe. Wasn't this payload crafted so precisely? If we put a nucleotide at a certain location in that payload, we want that there. Wouldn't it be ridiculously dangerous for ribosome in your cells to synthesize proteins according to a 78% accurate recipe? Prion disease comes to mind.
could be the other RNA is just some other payload that was put in? rather than being 'random' or 'degraded' it might be there for some other purpose.. but even if not, running random RNA sounds like a terrible idea.
We have been postulating here for a while that the cold storage constraints on the Pfizer vaccine probably was going to be used to say perhaps a portion of the batches were faulty/degraded in transportation.
Isn't it also lovely that they are basically in bed with the big pharma and essentially giving them the benefit of the doubt so readily and being so accommodating.
Also 78% integrity in the RNA payload sounds like an absolutely terrible path to a catastrophe. Wasn't this payload crafted so precisely? If we put a nucleotide at a certain location in that payload, we want that there. Wouldn't it be ridiculously dangerous for ribosome in your cells to synthesize proteins according to a 78% accurate recipe? Prion disease comes to mind.
could be the other RNA is just some other payload that was put in? rather than being 'random' or 'degraded' it might be there for some other purpose.. but even if not, running random RNA sounds like a terrible idea.