Someone linked the logs in another post, which is cool for transparency.
But I noticed there were quite a few bans over the past few days. Wasn't I thought it was bad when twitter banned people they didn't like? What's the deal here?
Disappointed, was hoping this wouldn't be like reddit.
What do you mean if they were really banned? I linked to the logs. It seems the mod here banned anyone who questioned the narrative here, which seems to be only believe everything Trump/Flynn/Powell/Wood say. Why aren't we allowed to question them? Why can't someone look at all the "evidence" and come to a different conclusion than you?
You want people banned for what you consider wrong think and label them a shill so it's ok to you. This is exactly what big tech is doing now but you cheer it on, It is 100% hypocritical.
Someone gets to decide who is the shill. Much like twitter or the government. How can you not see that this is no different? Right now, as someone said above, it looks like racists and homophobes and bigots are more welcome here than people who question Trump being a good guy, which should be a worry to anyone with a soul.