Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

230
posted 5 years ago by The_In-Betweener 5 years ago by The_In-Betweener +238 / -8
176 comments share
176 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (176)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– Crackpot 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I need a hive mind to investigate this. What chemicals were being housed at the AT&T address, 185 2nd Ave N, Nashville TN ? https://goo.gl/maps/qTUsDYmdSTSJrABt6

The RV was parked exactly where this white pickup is parked in this picture. https://imgur.com/a/2b2Rxnc

Which means the RV was parked directly in front of this NFPA 704 placard which indicated dangerous flammable chemicals are inside the AT&T building. https://imgur.com/a/XysjSvC

A description of the numbers and meaning of a NFPA 704 placard are here : https://imgur.com/a/LqyLzQZ

Here is a frame from the recently released body camera footage to show this location : https://imgur.com/a/UZ341C2

THIS IS WHERE I NEED HELP. I have been unable to find what chemicals match the NFPA rating of 3-4-1-W.

Whatever this is, it's rated the highest on the NFPA 704 fire danger scale (4). It can burst into flames at room temperature. It's also an extreme danger to health (3), unstable when heated (1) and reacts with water (W), meaning don't use water to extinguish the fire.

The closest chemical I have found is liquid hydrogen, which is 3-4-0-blank. The difference being liquid hydrogen is stable (0) and doesn't react with water.

I have been unable to locate exact matches to this rating after several hours of searching. If we find out what was stored in AT&T, it might help to understand the explosion, why it was a target, or other factors.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vatortech 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Liquid nitrogen is used to cool some electronics like computers

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Crackpot 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

But liquid nitrogen is inert. It has a NFPA rating of 3-0-0. Extreme health danger, but it does not burn.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy