Here’s what I am having a hard time wrapping my head around. In big digital infrastructure redundancy is the name of the game. If one system goes down another one picks up the slack. Data always has multiple routes to travel. That being said there should be no single point of failure. Why then, did one location going down from a bomb cripple half of the state?
You have presented a distinction without a difference. Issues to what extent? Perhaps issues to such an extent such that the word "crippled" might be apt in describing it? Just questions.
Here’s what I am having a hard time wrapping my head around. In big digital infrastructure redundancy is the name of the game. If one system goes down another one picks up the slack. Data always has multiple routes to travel. That being said there should be no single point of failure. Why then, did one location going down from a bomb cripple half of the state?
It wasnt crippled it had issues. Systems arent perfect.
You have presented a distinction without a difference. Issues to what extent? Perhaps issues to such an extent such that the word "crippled" might be apt in describing it? Just questions.