Trump and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein—beneficiary of 9/11 attacks From the very beginning of Donald Trump’s campaign for U.S. president in June 2015, Zionist Michael Glassner has worked as the campaign’s national political director. Glassner formerly served on the American Israel Public Affairs Commmittee (AIPAC), one of Israel’s biggest Zionist lobbies in Washington. If that weren’t enough, Glassner was the one responsible for PRIVITISING THE WORLD TRADE CENTER LEASE shortly before 9/11, for the benefit of Larry Silverstein’, who profited in the billions from the demolition of the towers. Trump told MSNBC what he thought of Silverstein, his fellow New York real estate tycoon.
DONALD TRUMP: “Larry Silverstein—he’s a great guy, he’s a good guy, he’s a friend of mine.”
Larry Silverstein divulges that he had the plans for the new WTC as far back as April 2000. Notice he states that construction started in 2002. These are not blueprints for some new structure that would be added to the existing WTC complex. He is referring to WTC7 being reconstructed in 2002. Note: He became a WTC leaseholder on July 24, 2001. So, why did he have plans as early as 2000?
So this film got delayed quite a bit in coming out. I believe they intended a release earlier in the summer or just before the anniversary.
Now that I've seen it, and how short it is, I'm confused and a little suspicious. I think they may have cut some things that really should have been included.
For example, there is no mention of Barry Jennings or any clips from interviews with him. I find this to be a glaring omission. Was that a conscious decision not to include his testimony?
Very disappointing and worrying in my opinion. The film is only 45 mins long, so running long could not have been a concern.
The only mention of explosions heard in WTC7 comes inadvertently in the end, as a reference in the lyrics of the rap song that plays as the credits roll.
The explosions are not even the most intriguing part of Jenning's testimony though IMO.
The most damning part of his testimony is how he said that when he arrived on the floor of the control center, everyone had already vacated the place. And when he called someone to ask WTF, that person told him to get the hell out of the building.
Instead, in the film, the only mention of fore-knowledge of the building collapsing comes from a casual statement from an alleged fire-fighter related by Indira Singh, and then the media, likely relaying those rumors heard on the ground that day.
Why do they use this clip, instead of Jennings much more damning and compelling testimony? This is very troubling.
Trump and “Lucky” Larry Silverstein—beneficiary of 9/11 attacks From the very beginning of Donald Trump’s campaign for U.S. president in June 2015, Zionist Michael Glassner has worked as the campaign’s national political director. Glassner formerly served on the American Israel Public Affairs Commmittee (AIPAC), one of Israel’s biggest Zionist lobbies in Washington. If that weren’t enough, Glassner was the one responsible for PRIVITISING THE WORLD TRADE CENTER LEASE shortly before 9/11, for the benefit of Larry Silverstein’, who profited in the billions from the demolition of the towers. Trump told MSNBC what he thought of Silverstein, his fellow New York real estate tycoon.
DONALD TRUMP: “Larry Silverstein—he’s a great guy, he’s a good guy, he’s a friend of mine.”
Larry Silverstein divulges that he had the plans for the new WTC as far back as April 2000. Notice he states that construction started in 2002. These are not blueprints for some new structure that would be added to the existing WTC complex. He is referring to WTC7 being reconstructed in 2002. Note: He became a WTC leaseholder on July 24, 2001. So, why did he have plans as early as 2000?
So this film got delayed quite a bit in coming out. I believe they intended a release earlier in the summer or just before the anniversary.
Now that I've seen it, and how short it is, I'm confused and a little suspicious. I think they may have cut some things that really should have been included.
For example, there is no mention of Barry Jennings or any clips from interviews with him. I find this to be a glaring omission. Was that a conscious decision not to include his testimony?
Very disappointing and worrying in my opinion. The film is only 45 mins long, so running long could not have been a concern.
The only mention of explosions heard in WTC7 comes inadvertently in the end, as a reference in the lyrics of the rap song that plays as the credits roll.
The explosions are not even the most intriguing part of Jenning's testimony though IMO.
The most damning part of his testimony is how he said that when he arrived on the floor of the control center, everyone had already vacated the place. And when he called someone to ask WTF, that person told him to get the hell out of the building.
Instead, in the film, the only mention of fore-knowledge of the building collapsing comes from a casual statement from an alleged fire-fighter related by Indira Singh, and then the media, likely relaying those rumors heard on the ground that day.
Why do they use this clip, instead of Jennings much more damning and compelling testimony? This is very troubling.