Time is relative, just not to man. Relativity's dumbness is idolatry followed to its logical end.
By the same logic, Newtonian mechanics is wrong for taking reason and the material world as the only givens. It inevitably leads to a kind of relativity.
The problem I'm getting at is: How can we know there isn't some way of placing relativity in the right context? If it makes accurate, testable predictions, unlike evolution and psychology, what is wrong with it? Every physical science confined to its own domain is tautologically relative. What makes the theory of relativity uniquely problematic?
Time is relative, just not to man. Relativity's dumbness is idolatry followed to its logical end.
By the same logic, Newtonian mechanics is wrong for taking reason and the material world as the only givens. It inevitably leads to a kind of relativity.
The problem I'm getting at is: How can we know there isn't some way of placing relativity in the right context? If it makes accurate, testable predictions, unlike evolution and psychology, what is wrong with it? Every physical science confined to its own domain is tautologically relative. What makes the theory of relativity uniquely problematic?