1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just did. I only have video and images from online sources, I have never taken images myself. But I see what you see. Flares coming from the sun.

What else do you think I would be able to conclude from that? I guess with a spectrophotometer, I can tell you what type of gases are visible.

With simple trig, I can estimate the distance to the sun, and then estimate the size of the flares, which are probably just a few kilometres, not hundreds of thousands of miles.

How would you explain solor flares? Could chat gpt do better than you at explaining it? I guessing so, since you would just be telling what I already know or could easily ask GPT to summarise.

I'm not quote other people, I am thinking for myself. Are you really thinking for yourself? You won't even take me seriously, I doubt you're able to ansk the questions you need to ask to yourself

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya, same as anyone who sees them. I don't assume the sun is huge though

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seriously, at least you're following. That's still a long ways from being able to have a grown up conversation.

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

The studio light is off frame, to the left, and as the light from that lamp spread outward, you can see the shadows at different angles.

Denial doesn't make it true when you say white man walked on the moon. White man fooled everyone to claim he walked on the moon, and all of NASA was started and still run by kzarians, making you a Jew tool, like the rest of them

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone who looks that image can clearly see studio light dipshit.

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, you are the brainwashed tool. I'm cooperative, i explain why you can't talk to me like this and still expect that I will spend time to answer several questions at once, asking in disbelief not as genuine questions.

You get what you dish out. If you want someone to be nicer to you and answer your questions, turn down the condescendce, actually do some research before you ask questions, or just be a pleasure to talk with, then, I would tell you to fuck outta here. You know?

Probably not processing this either. Typical programmed sleepers, always the same

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, I explained why I won't present data. You just won't process that your such an enormous douche that I wouldn't waste my time with you

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sad. You judge before knowing. It's the internet. You can learn for yourself. I'm not gotta be able to break your programming for you. I can lead you to water though

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are book. This video makes no effort to prove flat earth. It's not possible. I don't have to prove the earth is flat, just that it's not round.

And ya, with science.

You've been shown, but I'm not gonna present data to a guy who won't even watch the videos that he needs to in order to calm down

If you looked at the link. Or even read what said. We'd be talking. Instead, you wanted to feel big.

But you're still never going to learn like that

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you're admitting that you don't understand the concepts of parallel light. And your too committed to your weak ass theory that someone pays me to fuck with you

I do this shit for free

0
Jim_donald 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's really hard, getting through to people, you know? Don't be that guy.

Last video. It's about programming. Not flat earth

https://youtu.be/XiyUiqZ3ekY?si=srOGLw_gaJ9eQNMr

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

You humiliate yourself only. I schooled U again

0
Jim_donald 0 points ago +1 / -1

And regurgitating the thing about ancient Greeks. You mean Erastantonis. Ya, that wasn't and isn't proof, still. It unscientific Here https://streamable.com/356zse

0
Jim_donald 0 points ago +1 / -1

You haven't actually been down this road. Your are lying because all you did was look a little.

If you really looked into it, youd be able to explain why you think the lack of observed curve is missing, or how the sunset works, why stars appear to be different part of the universe from Australia

0
Jim_donald 0 points ago +1 / -1

Problem is, and the video was trying to show you. You are not actually open.

You don't even understand the basic premise of a model you claim wouldn't work. You think what, that flat earth is a theory, right? No, it's an observation. The theory is the globe. And it's easy to disprove when you try. I'm not going to break the programming mentioned in the video you didn't actually watch. You know you didn't. Just like you know you don't understand any of the many arguments against the globe. Easy stuff. You never looked.

You're missing out because this could be the interaction that changes your life's trajectory and you're too busy trying to flex ego on me, who you think is stupid, easy target

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, like I stated. U would prove me right by spazing out

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lastly, you'd be very wrong to assume you have more grasp of science than me

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you really put stock in the science rhetoric you started with, then you'd understand that flat earth is not the model to be proven. It's the default, the control.

The flat earth model better describes what we observe from earth. And it's very easy to debunk the theory of the globe and it's accompanying space speculation.

You could do it, but you might be too far programmed. Start by considering what it's like to be me

Trying to explain a topic that is strangely taboo and met with visceral and condescending behaviour, typically.

Here is a video that might give you an insight. It's not to prove anything, it's to check yourself.

https://youtu.be/fxDYKSYBJAY?si=dbQGzJSScPGhd_wJ

It's your knowledge journey. I can help but don't want to fight

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't fail to notice my own contradiction because I did watch the video, Ive even seen it before.

You just failed at addressing any of my points.

If I am saying I don't believe him, he can say he got special laser feed back efficiently adjustes for the huge distance to the moon, but that distance is based on wrong heliocentric model crap.

U Can't take me seriously. Just moved on .

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

i have a better idea, you watch this video. its not about flat earth, but it might show you the mirror. https://youtu.be/fxDYKSYBJAY?si=QeXfzDTKp0Waov8o

it tought to confront yourself. its tough not to judge a book by its cover. to seriously apply yourself when you feel like its going to be a waste of time, take bravery, curiosity, and an inquitive, confident mind.

you can blow it off too, i dont have skin in this. i just like sharing what i know, because its interesting and it explains a lot about the world and political climate we are in. i know, doesnt make sense to bring in politics. but you have to understand what it would mean if the world really isnt a globe, and they are actually working togeather to manage a huge population of planted humans within these continents, and that explains why no civilans can go south of 60th.

its a big world, and flat earth is not what you think it is.

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

SO, what makes me stupid, that i dont beleive this the images shown to us by NASA? or that this guys is telling the truth? maybe he is just regurgitating too.

did you see that you dont need a mirror to bounce a laser off the moon? so, maybe there isnt really a mirror there? or maybe we are just getting fed a narrative, filmed, edited, approved, aired, and marketed....sucker.

instead of just assuming you dont even need to look into, why not take it on, fior yourself and see why so many intelligent people say the moon landing are all fake, its not because they have some inside knowledge. its because its obvious. you just have to trust you own mind to think the arguments through.

stop just regurtgitating and trusting other people with your facts and world view

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

for real, you go on about me telling lies and how obvious the proof is, when you have eyes, this thread is about a photo, use your eyes and tell me why the fuck the shadows arent in the same god damn angle. if the sun is 90 million miles away, even it it was only a few thousand miles away, like we see on earth, the shadows would be the same angle.

your argument is...."Because I have eyes."

survey says......ennnnnnt, sorry, looks like you didnt understand the question maybe? dont get how lies work or what is true, maybe you need nigger dick, or jew love, or whatever racist shit gets your nuts soggy.

your last argument against the obvious only possible retort you could make is forfieted...oh, lets see that again

or why the picture is faked...

and you said

Because it isn’t.

Hilarious, so you admit its not fake image, and that those shadows really are in differnt angles, and cannot explain why. congratulations Tallestskil, you just got mowed down like an 18 year old cum dumster after a racial gang bang

1
Jim_donald 1 point ago +1 / -0

i know the differnce between parallel light and defused light from a local light source. its not like the mechanics of photons are the that difficult to understand to this basic level.

Your dogmatic globe and space theory contradicts itself.
on one hand, the giant sun that is 90 million miles away, delivers effectively parallel light to the earth. this is space fact, as you cannot deny.

and on the other hand, we observe a small shadow, supposedly caused by the moon during a lunar eclipse, you beleive whats your been shown to be reality, and your bible verse on this matter is a diagram that tells you what you are seeing, that light comes from differnt angles from a huge sun to create a umbra and penumbra during a lunar eclipse.

so parallel light defuses around the moon. thats what you have to beleive, and its literally contridicting physics, there is the proof. using your common sense.

i know you want to just trust that the majority of scienctists would have told you that the earth is actually a globe, but you're still gonna have to reconsile this contricdiction in your beliefs, or just conceed by spazing out.

view more: Next ›