2
BladesLastBottle 2 points ago +2 / -0

your not wrong, many things can be learned from them

5
BladesLastBottle 5 points ago +5 / -0

they also live longer too, like 20 years longer.

6
BladesLastBottle 6 points ago +6 / -0

like everything in life, the true answer is more complicated and darker then first perceived.

Those baby picture most likely come from south Korea or China. you'll notice all are intact, they always are.

now ask yourself why? There aborted right? abortions are highly destructive to tissue, they basically shred the baby and rip it out in pieces.. yet these babies are whole.. now if they were from organ harvesting they wouldn't be intact either. we have hit the same problem. whats going on here.

well i could slow walk you... but im pressed for time so i will just lay it out. These babies are the result of specialized abortions designed for embryonic stem cell harvesting. They are after the stem cells in the placenta and umbilical cord, which is why the babies are whole. they cant just mash em up cus they need the cord placenta intact.

4
BladesLastBottle 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can attest you are right about the lack of information surrounding it. I think iv only found 1 book and a handful of papers about it. Although i have a differing opinion on why there is this lack of info, I must say you do have a good point.

3
BladesLastBottle 3 points ago +3 / -0

its funny how they say all these dates go back 1000+ years. in the 14th century the version of the vulgate they were using was sangallensis lol which isn't even the whole bible. Nor is it a book. its animal skin manuscripts.

dont you find it weird that they say they had the whole thing complete in book form in the 7th century, but then for some reason ended up useing a incomplete form written on animal skin for the next 700 years?

naw, someone lied

3
BladesLastBottle 3 points ago +4 / -1

the dating of this book is way off. Decorative borders on the pages and colored illustrations are a dead give away, not to mention they were using codexs and rolled manuscripts then. Id bet my life that book is less then 500 years old

2
BladesLastBottle 2 points ago +2 / -0

was this before or after golf and go-carting?

7
BladesLastBottle 7 points ago +7 / -0

people look at the santanic panic wrong. it wasnt random families witch hunting out of paranoia like we are told. It was 10s of thousands of families world wide walking up to organized ritual abuse

3
BladesLastBottle 3 points ago +3 / -0

someone needs to fire his handler, he keeps saying the quit part out loud

1
BladesLastBottle 1 point ago +2 / -1

thought experiment, maybe we got it wrong.

The creator made a realm, a chaotic realm built on the simple concept of pure survival. violence is the foundation of his creation and the only thing guaranteed is death. when the "demons" fell what did they do? The books say they taught us everything we know. They taught us how to survive.. they taught us methods to make our life easier with fleeting moments of joy. they taught us how to become masters of this chaotic realm.

what did god do as result? the bible says he tried to kill everyone...

2
BladesLastBottle 2 points ago +2 / -0

can i flee canada and get all that or is this only a people of color thing? im being 100% real with this question

0
BladesLastBottle 0 points ago +2 / -2

"The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork". naw im not religious

5
BladesLastBottle 5 points ago +5 / -0

lol the best jokes are always based in reality

1
BladesLastBottle 1 point ago +1 / -0

the stuff about cancer is on point. interesting post overall

1
BladesLastBottle 1 point ago +1 / -0

interesting post. definitely gonna come back to this when i got some spare time

2
BladesLastBottle 2 points ago +4 / -2

nothing in the reality is ever free.

5
BladesLastBottle 5 points ago +6 / -1

no no, the opposite. trust no words from anyone, even sources. BIll Copper said it best. Trust nothing you cant prove with your own research

1
BladesLastBottle 1 point ago +3 / -2

sourcing is weird. Its a good concept but just doesn't really mean anything nowadays. what someone considers a truth, or valid source is unfortunately tied to either there political view or religious ideology. Like right now, i could source you scientific papers describing AIDS transmission, and also source you scientific papers disproving viruses all together.

Hes right in a sense, what the point of sourcing when you have to independently fact check a source?

view more: Next ›