These Zionists have been constantly at war with our minds for decades with subtle, clever, and diabolically crafted programs of psychological infiltration and subversion. Certainly, we can't take anything away from what they've been able to accomplish that way.
But when you see something like this, you start to get the idea that they've really come to the end of the road with all that.
The guy the Poles need to highlight and focus on is the current US Ambassador Mark Brzezinski. I almost fell out of my chair when I learned he had been appointed. That was 2/22/2022, which was two days before the Russian SMO. All just a strange coincidence?
If his name sounds familiar, that's because his late, unlamented father Zbigniew set the Middle East aflame for half a century and counting. He gave us Al Qaeda and even gave OBL his big start in the murderous showbiz of terrorism. For their own safety, how do Poles not chase this guy down the street towards the nearest lamp post?
BTW, I only stumbled across his appointment about six months after it happened because nobody even noticed it. Nobody. So that's part of how we get the world we have.
Oh, they definitely wanted to get rid of the guy. This idea that European states are independent and sovereign, and that their leadership should serve the interests of their own populaces, is absolutely intolerable.
It started with Viktor Orban in Hungary, then spread to this guy in Slovakia. In Poland--which NATO is grooming to be the next Ukraine--President Duda thinks that way too, so PM Tusk is ready to knife him (at the order of US Ambassador Mark Brzezinski, of course). In Georgia, a number of fistfights have broken out in parliament as They try to overthrow the government.
"They" no longer have the time and luxury of staging color revolutions, as they did with Yanukovich in Ukraine. Point is, They just need these fuckers dead. It's all actually a sign of that They are losing their grip and are desperate.
Few will be interested in this but I'll pass it on anyway: This book of the Bible--unique AFAIK--is written from the perspective of one of the handful of fully conscious people while all the rest are unconscious (NPCs in the current lingo).
To get the correct feeling for what's going on, think of Season 1 of "Westworld" but imagining that Bernard has been put in charge of the park. You'll have to adjust somewhat because Bernard was duped into thinking he was a human when he was actually one of the Hosts. The writer here is aware of the state of affairs.
The other adjustment, of course, is that "Westworld" concerned Hosts and humans, while in this work, the writer and his fellow humans take the place of the Hosts, while the place of the humans in the show are actually... well, that's a longer story.
How would Bernard feel watching the toils and sufferings of his fellows, day after day, in an endless cycle? Would he write something similar?
I would concur in that the losses in "public sentiment" are far more grave than any losses the Zionists are suffering on the battlefield (which are already substantial). Really, that is what will seal their fate. It possibly already has.
In this information age, their numerous crimes and outrages during this conflict are only beginning to be told. Lots and lots of people--from the head of the UN to blue-haired progressives on Ivy League campuses--are "on to them", and they are never, ever going back.
The Zionist project is done and finished when you can get a substantial number of people to simply think, "Yeah, those Zios and the religious nuts that support them are the only genociders I know about, and they did it in my own lifetime. They always talked about the Holocaust and said they were the victims, but then we were always taking their word for it, weren't we?"
When evaluating the "big picture" of the Global Elites and how They are running the world, almost all people (who make any evaluation of the situation in the first place) are still working under a fundamental premise that is now an almost entirely false.
That is, they are still thinking in terms of "tax cattle" and "exploitation of the masses" and other similar ideas. Most particularly, the defining characteristic the flow of resources to the Elites. The main idea is for the rich to make themselves richer.
The situation has clearly changed dramatically over the past few years but conspiracy theorists don't seem to have caught up to it. The key characteristic now is the flow of resources away from the population. The main idea is for everyone to get poor, and then get poorer. What happens with the Elites is nearly irrelevant.
This particular situation is like other previous ones. People will look for the angle of how the corrupt Elites are scamming the public to make money. They know that's the case, so they will find the mechanism.
You can refer, though, to numerous other vehicles all around the world that are somehow not for sale in the United States, everything from 125cc motorbikes to small utility vehicles to turbodiesel sedans. They'll justify the import bans with safety or emissions or whatever, but who could possibly believe They care about such things? These vehicles are more efficient, cleaner, cheaper, etc, but most crucially, many people would want to buy them.
So why are the capitalist Elites, for whom too much is never enough, not selling those vehicles to you to make another buck? That's because the Real Elites, the ones who actually run the world, know that you are worse off without them.
It's not a message, per se, but in the proper environment I try to talk about my understanding of the world as if it were a matter of fact (which, of course, I fully believe it to be).
Manipulation is too strong a word, but there's an important dynamic at play. You see, normies are trained to recognize "authorities" as those speaking as authorities. Think of all your teachers in school, or the fancy people on TV, or politicians and government officials. Do they ever start with, "I'm not real sure, but..." or "You know, my opinion is..." or "You're a faggot if you don't think that..."? Nope, never. They just speak as if everything that came out of their mouths was undisputed, bedrock fact. The fact that the vast majority of it isn't just highlights the point.
Maybe the aim here is to tickle that little spot--in people who have it--that creates the thought, "Hang on a sec. Fuck, wait. Does this jackass actually know something I don't know about this, but should? Dammit, maybe I should pay attention for a second."
Seems like a molehill, but what a mountain to climb!
I always think of what goes on with these people like when probably most of us, as children, were teased that we were adopted. It was extremely upsetting and everyone flips out when it happens. The more they talk about it, the more the child flips out.
That is a completely, absolutely, 100% irrational reaction. It's a serious situation that may require action, and the more info you have, the better, right? You haven't even evaluated it and you don't need to act on it immediately, but clearly you should collect that intel. But in reality, the more you hear about it, the more realistic and truer it becomes, and the more upset you get to the point of hostility.
For me, it's a pretty precise analog, and I don't think that's happenstance. I think the very same psychological mechanisms are at work. Or more precisely, it's a window into how the human mind actually functions.
Not to dodge the question, but after long research I have come to the unfortunate conclusion that what is very informally described as the "NPC" phenomenon is real (although there is much, much more to say about the actual nature of it).
Roughly speaking, they get their "truth" from authority. Conspiracy theorists are well familiar with this as progressives getting their truth from what is a nearly universally leftist media.
We now regrettably get confirmation on the flip side. People we thought were MAGA patriot America-First truthers come out in bewildering support of Israel and it's open genocide. And how could they possibly not get who America's Worst Enemy is? A few names are: Western Journal, Gateway Pundit, Kid Rock, and (what a letdown) James Woods.
They surely did not come to these reprehensible views through an evaluation of history and circumstances. Nor do I think James Woods is getting AIPAC campaign donations. I would suggest it came through the "authority" of the pulpits of Christian Zionists, either directly or indirectly through their circles of association. They are--without reservation in their own minds--doing God's work, what good Christians do, and serving the return of the Savior.
There are calculations that support the idea that NPCs comprise 80% of the population. To be technical about it, they are incapable of "waking up". However, for many decades they were given more or less reasonable truths--or at least tolerable attitudes--from their authorities on TV or in church. The situation would be greatly different were we to return to that state of affairs.
As a final note to directly address the question as posed, I tried for many, many years to wake people up with the most startling, surprising, fascinating and shocking truths I knew. They certainly startled, surprised, fascinated and shocked me awake. There was no effect on others, and that because that's not how it works for the vast majority of people.
Currently, I have the policy of giving the truth only to those who ask. Very, very few ask. Almost all who receive it, reject it. That's a secondary dynamic, where their subconscious judges the truth to be psychologically destabilizing. The truer it is, the more destabilizing. The easy task then is to invent a rationale to reject it.
Well, if anyone finds all that quite a demoralizing state of affairs, then you see exactly what I'm talking about. If you feel you wish to reject it, yeah, I thought so.
Side note: it seem to me that the impact of the Carrington Event has been vastly overstated. Readers here would probably assume that was on purpose and part of the existential strategy of tension to which we are all subject.
Really, take a look at that section of the wiki. There is no mention of any damage, only descriptions of the bright and spectacular auroras, and that telegraph operators ran their connection for two hours without battery power.
Fear-mongers and the fearful will wave their hands around about what "could happen" in our modern technological age, but then that's what fear-mongers and the fearful do, isn't it?
The realistic threat, if any, is that "They" will one day see fit to cut off your electricity, Internet, and cell, then scream, "cArRiNgToN eVeNt!" Almost everyone would fall for such a ruse.
If you observe very closely, there's a dynamic on display particular to females, which will be familiar to anyone who's been in an argument with one.
The broadcaster starts out with the natural reaction and undertone of, "I'm off balance because this Daniels character has turned out to be a total loon, beyond anything I heard about before or ever imagined."
Within about 45 seconds, though, it becomes, "I support strong women and no one should shame them." She quickly pivots to, "Donald Trump sucks so much and everything is his fault and I hate him." Off to the races!
I think many of us have "been there".
It looks ;like Sinn Fein is basically in the same state as the RINO Republican Party.
Immigration is tearing Sinn Féin apart: Ordinary nationalist voters are a million miles away from the party’s liberal-elite leadership. (Spiked 1/8/2024)
Normies will never get to this conclusion through any of their analysis, but the party has clearly been infiltrated and subverted.
In their normie paradigm, they see it as "walking a political tightrope". The reality is, "How do we remotely control a political party to go directly against the wishes and interests of it's members without them noticing."
We've really got to try to keep these things alive. I once thought the truth was like match that would set the world alight as soon as it got loose. Sure' it's a match, but it's like holding it up to wet newspaper... lol
I didn't include it before, but for comparison there's an alternative theory:
WAS TIANJIN, CHINA HIT BY HYPER-VELOCITY ‘ROD FROM GOD’ KINETIC ENERGY WEAPON? (8/17/2015 by Russ Winter, now at winterwatch.net)
I actually subscribed to that theory for a long, long time, since it was Jim Stone's take. You know what the easy deciding factor is, though? The fire that was already burning.
A fire set before the nuke is detonated is a pattern you see over and over: 9/11, Beirut, numerous ammo dumps, etc. Must be a weird psychological effect that totally throws people off, like, "Oh, I guess that fire just spread to something explosive." If it just went off with an enormous bang, even normies would probably say, "TF was that?! A nuke!?"
Also, if you set a fire and then your rod from outer space missed by a couple of hundred meters, normies might notice that too.
Netanyahu is running out of interest groups in Israhell that he can piss the hell off. The place was on the verge of civil unrest before 10/7 (which was why they did 10/7 in the first place) and it's only gotten worse. You have to wonder if this will finally tear it.
On the flip side, the good news is that Binyamin has been pushed to this desperate step because he can't get enough Heebs and goyim to go along with the plan.
I don't think SGTReport has this correct. You can distinctly hear the woman has an Asian accent. Also, if they knew what was going to happen, why would she ask if he was filming? This is stacked up against two women's voices sounding similar in very brief clips.
Did Mossad do it, though? I'd say the chances are 99.9%. First, an analysis of the event:
Confirmation Tianjin was Nuked (Veterans Today 8/25/2015)
The toasted cars, just like 9/11, are a dead giveaway. An interesting quote from the article given the Beirut Port explosion almost exactly 5 years later:
Given the 3km evacuation zone we can assume an explosive yield of around 3 kilotons. A typical cruise missile nuclear warhead such as the Israeli ‘Popeye’ carries 6 kilograms of plutonium; using the rule of thumb of 1 kiloton yield per kilogram of plutonium, the size of the explosion correlates with the yield of a typical cruise missile warhead.
The explosion at Beirut Port was from a nuclear-tipped Popeye missile. Funny, right? I think they're wrong about the yield here, though. It's much bigger. So maybe it was a 6kT Popeye warhead? Looks even bigger to me, more like 10kT. The crater it digs out is 400m across.
So was it Israel? How many suspects are there for such events?
The Russians have always found the Ukraine War regrettable and unpleasant, considering it clearly a fraternal conflict provoked by outside forces where they are forced to kill brotherly Slavs.
I doubt they'll have the same feelings of reluctance regarding these willing participants.
Funny irony leading to some insight: It's been almost entirely forgotten, but Robert De Niro promoted the movie "Vaxxed" and came out in support of it. He has an autistic son and--although he's never said so publicly--he has probably put two and two together. He was quickly given a talking to and shut up about the movie.
De Niro now has one of the worst cases of TDS, for which there is no known vaxx. But of all the unhinged ranting he does, he has nothing to say about Trump regarding the COVID vaxx.
That is, he could say, "Trump is like Hitler, and even tried to kill us with the beastly jab because he's too cheap to pay for ovens!" Or he could go with, "Trump is like Hitler, but at least he gave us Operation Warp Speed."
I suppose my point here is that Bobby neither a rational and dispassionate analyst nor some kind of "true believer", but rather a subject of manipulation. Conspiracy theorists are virtually universally under the impression that the prominent figures they are presented with are either In The Club or Not In The Club. I believe it's more subtle but hardly anyone can keep up with that.
Why do you keep telling me? Do you think I'm interested?
You need me to agree with you because your own subconscious is not convinced. It's a lot easier for your conscious mind to think other people are just ignorant. You will never, ever get to the truth at this rate, buddy.
But then again, as I said, few people actually want that.
How long until we're simply banned from saying the word "jew"?
"You can't say that word! That's not your word, it's our word!"