I guess it was time for another Epstein distraction.
After all the European support to Ukraine and sanctions of Russia they've given Russia an excuse for future military action against Europe.
It's a strange self fulfilling prophecy, but likely by design. Get the whites fighting each other right? Of course the Jews want the whites neutralized. But God is in control, ultimately I don't worry about the Jew's plans (or the Catholics or whoever).
This is not a good look for you.
It needs better accuracy
I'm sure Kosmos can do some great bs-ing that looks correct. It sounds like all it will be is a tool to get some scaffolds going which a real scientist can fill in.
"Self-driving labs" are already using AI to design and perform experiments
It doesn't seem to really be designing the experiments. The entire system is human designed by real scientists / engineers. The computer is processing data and then saying which (likely predefined) experiment it should "conduct next". And most of the innovation there seems to be the dynamic flow approach speeding things up.
That's a useful pattern recognition tool (ML), but it's not doing the same work that went into designing the self-driving system itself.
Computers beat humans at chess a long time ago.
Science is not chess. Science involves making observations then coming up with the chess board itself and testing if that board approximates reality well enough to be useful. A computer can be designed to calculate moves on an 8x8 grid, a very controlled environment that requires no deeper understanding. Science requires actually understanding concepts, which AIs can't do.
LLMs particularly are consensus driven machines. Consensus science is just the status quo.
At best an LLM will end up "coming up" with a new concept by ripping off some actual scientist in an unknown journal which it scraped data from.
If you're talking ML in general, they could design systems based on existing molecular models looking for certain types of new chemicals to synthesize. Ok, but big deal IMHO. Not going to cure cancer or make humans extinct. In fact the funny thing about cancer is (good) doctors have already figured out the cure, people just won't listen. It's not a magic drug , it's a holistic approach with fasting.
The entire industry is the boy who cried wolf, Elon was just one famous example. We could look at Altman saying "we know how to create AGI", CEOs saying "50% of our workforce will soon be AI" when no such thing happened the last 2 years, the various faked demos by major tech companies (highly misleading / deceptive tech demos), and so on. Elon is merely emblematic of the industry.
Now they're using robots with AI that make their own decisions...
Where, who? And working with humans? All I've seen are some laughable optimus demos, a crappy PR stunt by Boston Dynamics with a humanoid robot moving parts at Hyundai (in a very controlled low stakes area), and Boston Dynamics robots doing backflips. I'm yet to see robots making their own decisions and working with humans in manufacturing.
I think the huge amounts of money for energy are mainly to service billions of users.
If it's not worth the money then don't service those users, simple as that. Meanwhile OpenAI recently admitted they are implementing ads, which just a year prior Sam Altman said would mean they are getting desperate / looking for a last resort.
no law of the universe that prevents AI from getting smarter than humans
LLMs by their nature are dependent on human knowledge. They are not thinking, they process words that humans wrote and create a statistical model from it, to emulate that knowledge. It's a statistical model predicting outcomes based on accumulated human data.
If it feeds off its own data, it will go off into fantasy land due to its own hallucinations corrupting its training data.
Amazon already use autonomous robots
Manufacturers have been using robots for many decades now. What's new?
As for the humanoid portion, what percentage of that are they? 0.01% for beta testing perhaps?
At some point it might reach diminishing returns
That's where we are at. When you're adding in exponentially more money and electricity for linear improvements in the product the returns are diminishing.
And if you want to talk about actual dollar returns, there are no profits except for those selling chips. But every so often they come out with another "just wait 6-12 months, we're replacing most of your jobs". Believing the boy who cried wolf is just silly. These are companies who still can't make a profit saying this to stay relevant.
If an industry relies heavily on lies to get funding and stay relevant, that calls into question the entire narrative about it, especially in the near term. It's more than just months, AI companies have been playing the "6-12 more months" game for 4 years now.
We are seeing improvements in tools that help programmers and that's to be expected. Being able to actually replace them, let alone the even more enormous jump into autonomous robots (which could somehow replace migrants) is not even in the cards short of some miracle.
They've cranked their AI as far as it can go, spending more than any companies in history on capex. We're at the point some of them are even talking about building their own nuclear reactors because of the high energy demand. This is well into diminishing returns. It's exponentially more money and energy for linear (or logarithmic) gains.
Ok you're a bag holder, we get it.
Crash?
A crash is still a crash even if you have a cyclical commodity. However, there is no fundamental reason to believe the bitcoin cycle continues indefinitely. In fact there is ample reason to believe it finds its intrinsic value of 0 eventually.
We've likely already passed peak market saturation. CNBC has been pumping the coin for years now, it has its own ETF, ponzi scheme companies like (Micro)Strategy cashed in big, everyone and their mother has heard of it. Be happy you made whatever you did and buy something of value.
The AI industry has already proven itself to be full of smoke and mirrors. It is at Elon Musk levels of bsing, so I am putting it in the "just another 10 years bro" category.
So far the experiments where they used coding agents to try and build something serious were predictably awful. They had agents try to autonomously build a web browser, and it just ripped off code from a known open source browser and made a mess of it. They regurgitate, they can follow old instructions (imperfectly), they can summarize consensus views, but they don't think.
The singularity can think and reason, if it were to ever exist, which is not guaranteed.
EDIT: And speaking of Elon Musk he's at the forefront of pushing the autonomy hype. Do I even need to list his many lies? Why should I trust these charlatan's when they say "we're so scared of the AI we've created!"?
Every year they claim to be freaked out over the latest tool. A couple years ago it was "Devin the autonomous software engineer". What happened there? Right it was a bunch of hype that didn't work.
But every year I must accept that "this time is different, we're telling the truth now"
A loan off of bitcoin is the most idiotic thing imaginable. Saylor predicts bitcoin will increase "30% per year for the next 20 years" allowing them to easily pay for all the promised interest payments to bond holders. After that, he says, "20% forever".
On a recent Fox News clip with Saylor on, he was allowed to explain away the Bitcoin crash and all the concerns about his ponzi scheme business with no pushback https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tGOvg288k.
It's all crooks running the show.
Getting Biblical here, the antiChrist (little horn) will
Through his cunning He shall cause deceit to prosper under his rule [Daniel 8:25]
Sure sounds like the crypto era under Trump.
"Arrested for Raping Toddlers" came from The People's Voice. For no reason at all they just decided to make their title "debunkable fake news" for an otherwise damning story.
Watch out for those guys.
You can see in the actual news article which they cited, he is clearly a horrible person who would like to do that, but you do not get to make up facts in your title.
They are using Einstein's theories in the calculations for their particle smashing experiments at CERN etc.
The atomic model itself is pretty good, it's all the new additions that are just pure fantasy with no yield in anything fundamental in physics. Just inventing new particles.
But the basics of quantum, that particles show wave behavior and the electron, proton, neutron are well established.
It's still not capable of doing that, and likely won't be any time soon if at all.
Look at much of their science and technology, it's more promise than reality. The obsession with Einstein leads them chasing after particles that don't exist (Higgs, quarks, etc). Fusion is always 10 years away. Their universe needs 70% dark matter and energy to keep that belief system going.
Yet we are to believe they have AGI around the corner that can take most jobs + power humanoid robots? Please.
No, as a rule people don't freeze it.
The only reference for anyone who does is from you, some anonymous person on the internet.
Grocery stores don't do it, nobody I've ever met does it. You'd render it inedible until you thaw it out, so it is not practical. It simply doesn't make sense.
The point of jerky is that it's storable at room temperature. That's why it is never in the freezer at the grocery store.
You've got such a hopeless Christ-less worldview though. I feel bad looking at the future with those lenses.
Nobody is promised tomorrow, we still have today to accomplish what we were born to do. And the satanic pedos do not and never will have all power. Simple as that.
I believe it was a class warfare thing. Basically Communists vs Kulaks all over again.
I wouldn't say there is one smoking gun. But when you put them all together it's a very strange obsession and it is clearly not actual jerky. Jerky doesn't go in the freezer.
For those who don't know you can search through the published emails at https://jmail.world/
Note Trevor Moore said "This tweet is just for #ModernaNation! Plz no reply’s from PhizerHeads. And J&J-offs gtfo"
Some rotation into energy has been happening this year.
But I believe we see a flow back into gold faster than after the 2008 crash. That's because now long term bonds are not interesting to smart money.
Jeff Gundlach the "Bond King" who is no hater of bonds, is against long duration government bonds, and only advocates short duration bonds and gold.
So what becomes the substitute for long duration government bonds? It's gold. Nobody wants the long term currency risk.
Doesn't blindly bend the knee? The guy was in full support of LGBT and hated Christianity. When did he rebel against the industry?