2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

I only used it as an example.

If you type 'relationship between fear and excitement' on google, what i said is the top snippet. It's a basic thing.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree in most cases too, i just find it pointless typing it out. I could just say 'noted' for most stuff.

But noting is quite important

3
pizzakek 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't tell if you ended up agreeing or are trying to troll someone else, kek.

5
pizzakek 5 points ago +5 / -0

It seems to be openly flaunting the capacity to control politics outside israel. Weird!

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only logic.

The Zardoz movie may help you understand. It is not a fantasy thing.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is excitation (in death and torture) that can easily be turned into that with the right stimulus.

The allure of the pleasure of sex and the one of the pain of death aren't that much unrelated.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually such a situation acts as a very strong natural viagra. If someone knows how to stimulate it properly.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could keep a couple copypasta links to the discussions and be done with it. Easier than write that message xd

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they all eat badly and have weak stomachs.

Germ theory is only one side of the equation.

Bacterias only act as pathogens if the stomach can't handle them.

It's like saying a house burned down because it had gas in it.

Now sure, there can be a mistake where from outside a super large sum of gas enters and overloads the system. Happens (and even then, if a system is very strong...). But most of the times, it's an ok amount of gas, put into a shit system with bugs.

It makes absolutely 0 sense to only consider the strength of a push, or the resistance of the wall, when judging the impact. 0. Either the push is too strong for the resistance, or the resistance is for the push. It's a relation, neither as an absolute is a smart take.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those are all just words that do not exclude each other.

'sabbatean'... Can be just a cover.

Likely your average psycho that get bought by international interests. His allegiances, a matter of self interest. Sabbateanism, a ticket to good money. What else.

Sabbateanism being a word that often get thrown around, but we should remember the sabbateans stay higher than this and usually pay this kind of fools to run their errands.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christianity being based in many aspects on hindu doctrine is a taboo topic for most, good on you for breaking it.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

From article

The boy’s corpse was discovered on Easter Sunday in the cellar of a Jewish family’s house. The Jewish leaders of Trento were immediately held responsible for the “ritual murder” of young Simon. All the Jews of the town were arrested, tortured, and forced to confess to the slaying.

The events in Trento were not the first time a Jewish community was held collectively responsible for the ritual murder of a Christian child. Back in 1144, in Norwich, England, a 12-year-old boy named William was similarly found dead. Years later, his murder was blamed on local Jews.

in the cellar of a Jewish family’s house.

not the first time a Jewish community was held collectively responsible for the ritual murder of a Christian child.

So basically they are admitting to such a thing as jewish ritual murder in the first 3 paragraphs. Nice one, times of israel, lol

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imma take the joke, hoping that's not the actual logic you use because it's 'energy of the dead from meat will make u sick' level else lol

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most carnivores will consume milk as adults if offered.

The only way to obtain milk is farming so that's why they don't, they wouldn't know how.

But as carnivore after meat the protein and fat of milk and eggs being animal based is the most digestible and nutritious.

Milk being a very good form of nutrition if raw and from healthy animals.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most people there, me included, have come to the conclusion that mercy kills alot too and are tired to pretend it doesn't.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +3 / -1

Well, i retract my previous shill statement so far. You are making some decent contributions. Happy to see that, and to be wrong sometimes, too.

8
pizzakek 8 points ago +8 / -0

Good meme. Share it wide! Thanks

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct.

No human vs human act is an isolated instance without larger repercussions. Those make sure it happens less.

0
pizzakek 0 points ago +1 / -1

the only videos I get are from people who act and talk about it like flat earthers

What is the 'talking like a flat earther' based upon for you?

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no form of info passable across the internet that isn't technically a 'doc'...

That's a real limit, not a strawman.

I even appreciate the skepticism... But there is no changing we meet in the world of html and even videos are now subject to fakery.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I liked the rest of trilogy more.

Space bandits was super fun, and the baron was absolute top notch.

Brazil stands a bit of meh in comparison, tho a good movie with great moments and ideas.

I like Gilliam mind very much. Love this quote of his (from his wiki):

Well, I really want to encourage a kind of fantasy, a kind of magic. I love the term magic realism, whoever invented it – I do actually like it because it says certain things. It's about expanding how you see the world. I think we live in an age where we're just hammered, hammered to think this is what the world is. Television's saying, everything's saying 'That's the world.' And it's not the world. The world is a million possible things.

His focus was more on unfixing concepts, shaking foundations, and opening new mental paths instead of the usual opposite.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am saying that if i do have to take that stance then i definitely can't be sure my mom isn't a doppleganger. Nobody can truly know.

The sort of docs that mostly are false are those aligned with narratives, not those that are unpleasant to it. Stochastic thinking.

Also, what sort of 'source' would you expect me to communicate through html? there are only docs to be had. What kind of thing i could include in an answer for you to verify would satisfy your terms exactly?

What could be done was to debate the sources, in the specific instance. But if you make an argument for docs being 'fakeable' (true, but then again all is a 'doc' these days) that's kind of lame, as it is the only content we can have.

If you prefer better words for it, instead of 'know', put 'history attests'

view more: Next ›