9
SmithW1984 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fairy tale time. They came through the portal, made a deal with the world governments and gave us AI. Of course they did, who could have predict we would have generative self-learning algorithms 10 years ago? Except... everyone involved in IT. AI is a is fake and gay because it's not intelligence, at least not in the way human intelligence works (which is through consciousness and will).

The whole confusion arises because a lot of people are stupid enough to believe they themselves are nothing but matter and electricity and their intelligence is just a complex organic algorithm called a brain. So of course it makes perfect sense that if we could replicate all the neuro-pathways and infrastructure we could built machines just like us. It's a fundamental worldview error causing this idiocy.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, offering your own child to be a lab rat for big pharma for a fake disease kids never suffered from. Just wow.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

So anarchy is whatever the individuals in the society choose it to be? Ok, then I'll make the case individuals in our society have made the choice (and affirm that choice every day) to have the form of government we live under.

It doesn't matter whether it's the smartest or the physically strongest that asserts their will on the rest - it's still will to power and the rest is means to an end. If authoritarian government is not antithetical to your particular definition of anarchy, then what's the argument about?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

So a corporate NWO is what we should root for? Also a corporation is hierarchical and rule-based by definition.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are no responsibilities in an anarchy - just people doing what they will, right? What he's asking is who can stop an anarchy from logically turning into a tyranny because the strongest naturally asserts themselves and assume power?

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's no free lunch. BTC falls in a similar category. All mainstream technology is controlled.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Arsenic? Mercury? Lead? Should I go on?

You're way less smart than you think you are.

btw you know they use similar method of culturing when they "isolate" the virus and sequence its genome, right? Isn't it ironic you're making fun of their method calling it out for being full of shit?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's one dedicated troll. Nothing like referencing a Lion King song to one up someone.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean developing poison they spray us with and put in the so called tests and vaccines which coupled with nutrient deficient and outright toxic GMO food, EMF pollution and psychological stress causes people to get sick en masse? It doesn't roll off the tongue as well as the word "virus" but truth often evades easy definitions.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because the NWO depop cabal says you don't and they make the laws in your country. It's easy. Whoever gives you rights can take them away from you. No one has the right to exist, because one moment you're here and the next you're dead. Your existence is not guaranteed in any way. "Muh rights" is a stupid concept - people have duties - like the duty to defend yourself and your family, the duty to be a good person, to tell the truth, to be informed, to help your neighbor, to stand for what's right, etc. - not rights. Rights are for weak feminized libtards and lolberts raised on western liberal democracy soy-rich diet and masonic lies.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are still not-fake-and-gay ways for them to poison and kill though. Them poisoning the wells is the oldest trick in their playbook.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write... "I know your works. Look, I have set before you an open door, which no one is able to shut. I know that you have but little power, and yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name. I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but are lying—I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you."

— Revelation 3:7–9

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +4 / -1

If what the whistleblower said about Bernie is right, imagine how many children did ol' Joe molest in front of camera to get where he is.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correction: Jews just don't like people who don't preach "anyone I don't like is dead". I didn't catch that. They don't like Christians and think Jesus was a false messiah and a blasphemer. They (the pharisees and sadducees) eventually killed him at the cross and took part in the prosecution of Christians which is told in the NT book of Acts (Paul the Apostle was one of the guys who prosecuted Christians before God appeared to him and straightened him out).

Also I dunno about you but are you aware that there are people who bring literal millennia of death, destruction, rat plagues, starvation and intellectual regression and are still venerated as heroes? There is a reason why there's a medival "dark ages" where all historical records are expunged after the Vatican took over Rome.

Here we go with the dark ages. This term and the idea of the unenlightened medieval ages was coined by degenerate anti-monarchists who fought against the church and wanted to bring about the illuminated Novus Ordo Seclorum. All historical records were expunged? That's simply false. Even if the Vatican destroyed some documents, the Byzantine historians wrote extensively throughout the whole middle ages.

You can reskin those values with things like "God", "Horus", "Stalin" or "Covid-19" and you still cannot mask their true agenda. It's "anyone that I don't like is dead".

I don't see an answer here. Why were the romans cool but the Christians are not? And why do the NWO cabal want to bring down Christianity if they are on the same team?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't, but people around you will use it. Good luck convincing them the term was invented by the CIA - they'll just laugh it off and say that's exactly what a conspiracy theorists would say.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is some Adam Green level of idiocy here. Are you aware jews don't like Christians and outright hate Jesus? Why would they paint Christians favorably and lie about their persecution? But of course Dr CANDIDA Moss is not one of those falsifying history, right?

Guess who's the main opponent to the whole LGBT libtard agenda and who's the main antagonist sticking to traditional values and (based) bigotry according to the NWO stooges? Why is the libtard worldview wrong according to you when it's based on the same secular humanist ideas you'd agree with?

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or just save it by Print -> Save as PDF

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you stupid? I addressed that here:

You are presupposing an already developed rule-based society and that's understandable because one can't even imagine what the opposite would be like apart from devolving into murderous savagery.

Sun Tzu and Nietzsche didn't live in lawless anarchical societies but in highly organized hierarchical societies. Sun Tzu, Machiavelli and modern day intelligence services find ways to game the system and outsmart their opponents. You can't be a great chess player without following the rules of chess.

Wtf geopolitics has to do with anarchy? Warfare is an abstraction. We have warfare because we have societies, that are organized hierarchically the same way an individual is (you have a head, arms, body, etc). In order to get to that level of abstracted aggression we must first observe how aggression is dealt with within society on individual level. Can you defeat a stronger opponent using your cunning? Yes, you can (like King David did for example). But that means in an anarchy you'll always have to be on your guard and ready to defend yourself (or attack) because it's free for all and there's no authority that will prevent or curb aggression.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

No need to apologize at all. Btw I'm Winston Smith writing from the Ministry of Truth. I think you got me mistaken for Will Smith.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The guiding principle is that we each take responsibility for ourselves. With that in mind, who is there to allow or disallow abortion? If you wish to abort, it is for you to decide.

If that's the case, who's there to allow or disallow rape and murder?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's not a Christian line of reasoning but I see it could makes sense to pragmatic thinking people. God is the standard for everything that exists, meaning that He cannot be unconventional. He's entirely conventional but we can't know His ways with our earthly limitations. He transcends human wisdom entirely:

"For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, “He catches the wise in their own craftiness”;"

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›