Kind of weird that reddit still have any of such posters. Any sane person even with only rudimentary critical thinking had to abandon that garbage bin in favor of other platforms at least with less obvious censorship, not even talking about really uncensored things in p2p realm.
But still I hear about reddit and how someone was banned again. WTF? What's the point? How could idea to post something obviously censored at reddit comes to someone mind? Is it like "I just got some obviously non-mainstream thought and should post it at the most censored mainstream platform"? It absolutely does not have any sense.
In the first place I would suppose that reddit itself do that posts to show their masters how they carefully fight "mis/dis/mal/whatever-information" to keep money flow. If there will be zero posts that have to be censored, then this flow will be quickly ended. Why their master will pay for doing nothing?
Another thing - Extremely weird that such posts still appear here. They does not contain any information at all. Does anybody here unaware that reddit is censoring everything that is out of their narrative? Anyone? So such posts are completely senseless.
And take in mind, that facebook, f.e. censor not less that reddit. And most commercial social platforms too. But I never saw here a similar post about "look, facebook banned somebody for something!". Only about reddit.
I could understand when axolotl_peyotl post something about reddit, at least he have some apropriate background personal story with reddit.
But why the fuck others do that? And why didn't they do that about facebook or linkedin or whatever social swamp you could imagine? Why only reddit?
Kagi search reached 20k paying members | Joogle alternative
Checked this one. Testing queries had "steve jobs", so took a look at the resilts. https://kagi.com/search?q=steve+jobs
No single link to the story how Jobs betray and rob his partner and real Apple founder and creator Steven Wozniak.
Questionable "alternative". And highly probably it is just yet another "independent search engine" that use commercial private Google API to Google search that allow adjust search settings, including ad links removal and all that stuff and use results for profit. IDK, may be Google have kind of personal plans for access to this API and they could be cheaper than that google proxy.
Lol.
Do you know that most refugees from Ukraine, including Western one are in Russia?
Also, do you understand, that Russia is the only country where this people have no any chance to be forcefully conscripted into meatgrinder organized by Jewish government of Ukraine?
Aslo 700,000 children is a very underestimated number.
I think it is around several millions children who fleed to Russia with their families since 2014 coup running from NATO ethnic cleansing. More than half ot that families moved to their relatives or close friends in Russia. Some families from DPR/LNR also sent their children to relatives in Russia long ago. It is definitely millions, not that tiny hundreds of thousands as authors of this bullshit article try to amase you due to enormous arrogance and ignorance of authors.
And this families and children are not Ukrainians. They are Russians, Polish, Hungarians, Romanians and so on. "Ukrainians" is artificial etnicity forcefully created not long ago, There was no such etnicity just 100 years ago, before Lenin created so called Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic from the part of Russia in 1922. Before that word "Ukrainians" was used as self-designated name only by political party appeared in Poland after Poland separated from Russian Empire in 1917.
Do you understand that the world "Ukrainian" literally means "man from outskirts" in nearly all Slavic languages? And just before Lenin created Ukraine state it was a kind of mocking name of population lived on the Malorossia territory. There is no any chance that any real etnicity will willingly choose such as seflf-designation. IDK, for English-speaking people it will be something like "outbackers", "rednecks", "villagers" or something like with grain of disdain.
It's kind of interesting to observe falling level of globalist MSM propaganda. When you think it already reached absolute bottom of that barrel of shit, somebody knock from below. :)
PS; Funny that RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty today blocks Russian and Belorussian IP addresses. :) In the past, Radio Liberty was western propaganda mouthpiece specifically targeted on USSR audience. It did everything to reach Russians with their narratives. Guess why today they block their target audience from access to their propaganda.
I can't say anything about topic at all, since there is just not enough data from US on that topic.
Only thing I could be somehow shure about, that secret tunnels under sinagogues is not a rare thing. There was a scandal in 90s in Moscow, when secret tunnel was found from central sinagogue to a yard of nearby multistore apartment building cluster. Then other tunnels was found under other sinagogues in other towns. Story was quickly shut down by MSM, and it was unclear what this tunnels was used for. Tunnels was not ancient and was found out that was built relatively recently, not earlier than 70s, so excuse that this tunnels was there from the very beginning didn't work for Jews.
No mattresses was used to cover sinagogue tunnel entrances.
As for assumption that NY tunnel was used by Jews for some rithuals looks too stretched. I think Jews in NY don't need secret tunnels for that, they will be perfectly fine even if they will eat babies alive in the most expensive NY resataunt or on White House lawn. MSM will just declare it some fine art performance or live art installation to attract attention to suffering of Jewish people. So, Jews hardly need this tunnel stuff for their rithuals or whatever.
Even if so, you obviously don't need things with enormous soundprofing properties, but very vulnerable to moisture to cover tunnel entrance, unless something very loud happens inside tunnel and you desperately want to deafen it.
Idea of using matresses to cover tunnel entrance will rise even more suspicions, than having matresses inside tunnel.
Elections are fundamentally made unverifiable and elected fundamentally have no any responsibility for fulfilling promises given to voters.
So, elections, at least in any existing form are just senseless. You can't verify that your vote was counted and counted correctly, and you can't do anything with politician who failed to do what he promised before election.
Taking in account that "freedom of choice" is a total scam when choice options selected by somebody else, the whole election crap should be discarded.
Honestly, even absolute monarchy or dictatorship looks much less disguisting with how that "democracy" looks like today. At least monarch/dictator don't need to make that regular disgusting shitshows and constantly lie to citizens.
Well, could elections have any sense at all? I think yes. At least, there should be implemented a way when any voter could verify results by himself, and elected politician should hold severe criminal responsibility with long jail time and confiscation for not fulfilling any electoral promises given to voters during his term. This is minimum. Also would be nice if only voters will be allowed to choose anybody they think is suitable for the job as candidates, not some shady forces pushing their puppets. That's where any discussion about any elections should start.
Honestly I don't remember such Russian proverb. But if you wnat Russian proverbs about kikes, then we have a lot. Some - http://co6op.narod.ru/txt/other/proverbs.html (in Russian, use online translator)
May be closest one is "A kike is like a pig: nothing hurts him, but he groans about everything".
I would argue for order of magnitude larger number. Though, at his time, may be fifty was enough...
Also, China, all business is state owned, so it's all moot.
Not all, but large ones or critical, like pharma absolutely have state ownership, in part or in full.
As far as I know, any Institute of Something, including Wuhan Institute of Virology could not fund anything, since such institutions are themselves exist purely on funding by those who pay for reserach - corporations or government grants.
This attempt to insert stupid allegation ruins all message.
It could be pretty valid assumption that some street war between narcodealers is an echo of war between some cartel and pharma corporation. And I even like that assumption because it is pretty reasonable to suppose that pharma corporations are very interested in hijacking illegal drugs market, and I even wonder why it is not a popular theory.
But what's the point to drag Wuhan Institute of Virology, that is obviously funded entity, not funding one into that? Is that done to make a theory that it is pharma corps, not some "cartels" really supply illegal drugs to population look stupid?
I think it could be another giant rabbit hole in that. BigPharma is a perfect and first suspect in illegal drug trade, especially taking in account that CIA and other agencies tied with drug smuggling and trade and those agencies perfectly sided with BigPharma in coronahoax providing censorship and persecution for their rivals. It is really possible, that today, it is not "cartels" who deliver most drugs to the streets, but BigPharma. And BigPharma now getting rid of non-kosher rivals. Or may be "cartels" is just BigPharma thugs and shadow dealers. Seriously, Hollywood produced tons of movies about how easy and profitable to make drugs, everyone with few flasks, white coat and respirator could do it and make millions. And BigPharma will just pass by that enormous profits having everything necessary for mass production of drugs along with secrecy and legal protection from anything? No fucking way.
I mean, now it's external liver.
Just like machine. The difference is only that pigs liver cheaper than machine.
Then they will find ways for an internal implant, then kidneys perhaps.
The problems with human internal implants are far from resolving. Why do you think pig internal implants suddenly become a better thing?
Then before you know it we have half pig men walking around or maybe they end up implanting a human brain in a pig body.
I see a lot of people without any sign of brains at all. And looks like everybody OK with that.
If only they put 5% of that research money into proper diet and preserving people's functioning livers.
This. And finding a way to really cure people, not just treat them.
But in current reality, I don't see this attempt to find alternative way of supporting people with faulty organs as something bad.
If you want to know what I account as worst problem with modern medicine, then, it is complete absence of solid guarantees from medics for the work they do and absence of their personal responsibility for the results of their work.
Doctor is just a servicemen for your body. His job is to fix your body properly and once for all. Just like a job of any other serviceman. And just like any other serviceman every doctor should hold a personal responsibility for the quality of repair and any failures in fixing your body.
Apart from jokes about transplanting pig brains into brain-dead politicians to make them minimally sane, I don't see such news as something bad.
If a pig liver could help to temporarily support someone life in absence of insanely expensive and still rare blood-cleaning machine or black-market donor liver and give time to find proper and ethically acceptable donor, then why not?
Taking in account that even human liver transplant require shutting down patient immune system turning one into permanent suffering source of wealth for BigPharma, some pig transplants that will turn humans into half-pigs is definitely not something from close future we should care about. And it is definitely better than slaughtering other people in far away countries for donor organs.
If pig liver could be useful for humans in addition to fried liver cutlet or making pet food, that's not that bad. Even ethically it is nowhere near at human organ trafficking.
Or it is assumed that there should be some disgust induced because pigs are not cosher for some tribes?
Replacement of failed organs is far from ideal thing. I'm not shure we will have a techology of growing/replicating ideal new replacement organ from same patient cells in foreseeable future, especially taking in account BigPharma profits from supportive treatment after transplantation, which will not be necessary in case of native replacement. Proper and guaranteed non-invasive curing/restoring of failed organs even less probable in modern world.
Wow! Saw exactly same things in drying drop of salted water in my childhood, when I got a microscope on one of my birthdays and studied absolutely everything I could find around.
Obviously, they do that nanorouter quantum dot graphene 5G chemtrail stuff for decades already!
\s
You could do the same - generate some source code, and compile/run it from same program - even in C or whatever language you choose. But it is nearly unuseable in context of some real runtime because creation of code in this way is highly uneffective and limited. And the main thing is that this is declared "bad programming practice" and condemned. Immutability is encouraged and forced in modern programming.
As for Forth - this language, as LISP is one of rare exceptions, but it is old and abandoned now. Meanwhile in USSR Forth was default language of first mass produced and popular personal computer BK0010. It was like Sinclair ZX or Commodore 64, but had 16-bit PDP-11 architecture. And it had Forth in ROM instead of Basic. So I played with it a lot at the time and may be that's why I get a clue about alternative programming approaches unknown to nowdays mainstream.
I also ejoyed discussion a lot, thank you!
But under the hood so many of the frameworks do this anyways.
Not really. The whole idea of self-modifying code is changing preprogrammed algorithm to something new. The whole idea of any JIT compilation is to preserve preprogrammed algorithm intact. You don't get program you never wrote using JIT compilation based language (well, sometimes you do, but this accounted as bug, not as intended behaviour). Also you will never get a code that executes differently on subsequent calls because it was changed in between. Same piece of code will always give same result with same input data. That's not the case with self-modifying code.
To illustrate what I mean, imagine funtion, say func(a,b){return a+b;}. Self-modifying approach could make same function be func(a,b){return a+b+2;} at one monent and func(a,b){return 3*a+b;} at another moment. Add to that conditions, cycles calling other functions and all that stuff.
Apart from self-modifying code some other things is necessary for real AI - undefined behaviour, accidental "mutations", computed goto's and all that stuff.
Why all that things is importnant for AI? Because intelligence is unpredictable. You can't just calculate the outcome of intelligent entity decision. And you can't speak about intelligence when you could predict a result with 100% certainity which is a core and absolute must for modern computing paradigm. Computer science was dragged by all that "good practice"/"bad practice" narratives as far from any possible AI as possible.
Our perception of intelligence and life in whole is connected with unpredictability of both. Take a look at following analogy - you could easily found ones who account their car as alive among owners of old cars. But you will not find any among owners of new cars. The difference in unpredictability. New car works as expected, everything runs as designed and it behave same in same situations. Old car is weared, there are more randomness in its behaviour due to backlashes, working regimes shifted, something creak occasionally and so on. It could give different results in same circumstances. Of course that's all have exact reasons, sometimes very complex, but for the owner, who don't want to dig deep it's just alive. And if you fix everything, return predictability, this mistery of life in piece of metal will disappear.
Same with intelligence. We will never account something predictable as intelligent. We here make fun over sheeple, as human NPC's accounting them unintelligent. Why? because they are predictable, like some machines or preprogrammed algorithms. And so we will never accept any AI if it will be predictable. And with modern programming approaches nothing unpredictable could be created.
Just block them, what's the problem?
Or may be you are suppose that somebody will create a perfect garden for you for free, to please your desire for seeking truth in perfect comfort?
No problem - you could use something like rapidshare where you completely independent from any owner or whatever and could create a perfect truth finding chatroom you totally control and do not allow any AI bots or whatever. Who knows, may be you will be able to make your place the best in the world and people will overcome their laziness and drop all that murky forums and stuff.
For me, as owners of this forum do not demand from me any info unnecessary for work of this forum and allow me to control my information flow, I'm perfectly fine with them.
No, of course it wasn't. But Jews often used alcohol to put population they parasitise on into debt and vegetable existence, even if they didn't produce it. Interesting ,that Jews themselves often suffer from alcoholism with full degradation.
A lot of languages could be used to write self-modifying code one way or another with different efficiency and haemorrhoids. Mostly it will be like brushing teeth through anus, but anyway. The problem is that it is declared "inapropriate", "bad practice", and all bad things possible. Also, self-modifying code is not in any language standard except LISP and hardly any modern programmer will even know that it is possible.
As for importance of that feature for AI, I don't think it is most important thing, but shure it is absolutely necessary for real AI.
Meanwhile about architectures. We all perfectly know about Harward and Neumann architectures, but other are pushed out, like stack machines, transport triggered, not even talking about ternary processors and other pretty interesting stuff.
Your thesis doesn't discuss your question.
I show real example that there exist many useful effects of AI that make it unwanted and even dangerous for TPTB, and I suggest that this is the main reason real AI will be never allowed.
Adding more and more clockwork to the clock will not make it think.
That's excellent description of what they do with "AI" hype. Have to save it somwhere. :)
As for AI possibility, IDK if it is possible or not at all. But I know that a lot of things that could make it possible and crucial for its creation is cancelled, ostracised or abandoned in both comuter science and areas of its application. One of my thoughts on that topic - https://conspiracies.win/p/17rSnsKbhI/yet-another-thing-critical-for-c/
I believe conciousness involves the non-computable.
Shure. And other things like fortuity, undefined behaviour and a lot of other stuff that today completely cancelled from computer science. And modern development of computer science drive it exactly to the direction opposite to anything close to AI.
"highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work"
Well, I'll call bullshit, since hardly bankers or politicians or something from their kind will allow something to outperform them in their most economically valuable (especially for themselves) work. :)
Modern ANNs posed as "AI", in the best case targeted at least economically valuable work, with very questionable results that could be achieved without any ANNs. And most of that is useless work, like writing marketing articles or making mock illustrations.
the pump "InNoVaTiOn" that is just marketing and ommissions, but under delivers on people bogus "sci-fi" fantasies.
Really, I estimate most "sci-fi" fantasies was pretty precise, just was made without taking in account evil forces that don't want technological development.
There's not really much left to advance in the physical sciences
That's what they want us to think. Really, there is whole areas of physics that are ostracised despite reproducible results of basic proof-of-concept experiments. Examples: Casimir cavity, Gunter Nimz FTL signal transmission through tunneling, energy driven space-time warping as in White-Juday experiments and so on.
Being validated, all that stuff just ignored because "there is no theoretical explanation" or "this contradicts relativity". Something like what happened with first LEDs discovered by Losev in 1920s. LEDs then was proved huge thing, but only 50 years later. Could you imagine if LEDs get proper attention 50 years earlier?
Peter Theil is a scumbag, but his conjecture that there hasn't really be anything revolutionary since the 1970's, is legit.
I agree with him. I wrote a lot about some hidden event around 1970 that stopped technological development. Also agree with him on his sentence about "we got fucking 160 chars in twitter instead of flying cars". Interesting, that flying cars are perfectly technologically possible today. It's purely TPTB artificial taboo that keep us from them. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQK9m_OBVgY And that dudes made it just for fun, they just like to make vehicles from bathtubs. There is no any technical problems to design and do mass-produce of average driver useable flying car for decent price if any current automotive industry giant had a desire to do it.
Well, worst case scenario is a valid target, but to get a meaningful result you should carefully separate facts from bullshit. Only then your worst case scenario will be useful.
Overestimating enemy abilities is as dangerous as underestimating them.
I could surprise you, but quantum computing does not exist today. There is a fundamental problem appear - to do something minimally useful you need many thousands of qbits in one processor. But more qbits you have in processor, less reliable result you have. You could build large quantum processor, but the usefulness wii be at the level of flipping coin to decide result. :) And most interesting thing that, by some scientists opinion proper solution to this problem will open a pandora box of unconventional energy sources and all such stuff, since it is connected with all that negative entropy and zero point energy things.
You pretty able to create new things without any language or external influence at all.
IDK, imagine, you need to invent something to prevent your charger cable from cracking near connectors. You could easily do that just imagining (does such word exist in English?:)) what exactly happening with cable during use that make cable break and localize problem. Then imagine different possible solutions and see in your imagination are they solve problem. Choose one that solve problem in simpliest way possible. You don't need to use any language, word or whatever to do that. Only visual images of already known things.
Phenomenon you speak about is more like intuition or flash of revelation or inspiration, when solution or idea just appear in your mind without any effort. There you have a wide range of thing to theoretize about, including your theory.
Both cases is act of creation and obviously intelligence, but one you do by yourself and other just happens.
So intelligence is definitely is a human property. And possibly, there could be influence of some external intelligence, but it is not obligatory thing.
Well, quick serarch in Russian language for "дореволюционные пивные этикетки" easily gives a lot of links, including f.e. https://pikabu.ru/story/pivnyie_yetiketki_dorevolyutsionnyie_birofiliya_part_2_6373397 where you could find full images of some beer labels used in OP collage. Like
https://cs10.pikabu.ru/post_img/2018/12/22/10/1545501519179068185.jpg
And even some with David star that is not in collage
https://cs7.pikabu.ru/post_img/2018/12/22/10/1545501533177840967.jpg
So, you are a liar. You didn't do any relevant search to check posted information.
Jewish participation in producing cheap alcohol in Eastern Europe is well-established fact. Nuance is in that they mostly act in Pale of settlement regions.
Thanks, but it's not there.
It is easily verifiable for anybody who dare to do it.
Also, it is funny that you are not happy when I not only confirmed the article information, but even told that their numbers are greatly underestimated.
So you are exactly like that Jews who stand for their obviously wrong and dogmatic 6 million exactly number and hysterically attack anybody who dare to claim any other number, regardless of is it larger or smaller.
So if your masters tell you that it is exactly 700,000 children "stolen" by Russians, then more real number of few million, or lower nubmer is in any case a heresy for you. It have to be only 700,000, nor less, nor more.
Mainstream is religion. Everything it tell is an undisputable dogma. That's the message you sending?