Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA vaccines and ensuing "pro-vax" and "anti-vax" groups linked to identity and political leanings were necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let
Let us see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA vaccines and ensuing "pro-vax" and "anti-vax" groups linked to identity and political leanings were necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let
Let us see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA vaccines and ensuing "pro-vax" and "anti-vax" groups linked to identity and political leanings were necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA vaccines and ensuing "pro-vax" and "anti-vax" groups linked to identity and political leanings were necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA vaccines and ensuing "pro-vax" and "anti-vax" political groups were necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA was necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Hence, the adverse effect profile and the inefficacy of mRNA was necessary [and therefore deliberate] to reach this stage. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
I guess they'll encourage us to own "convenient" and "unregulated" blockchain/NFT assets and securities in the Metaverse, but not "cumbersome" real world assets (eg: by complicating tax rules so much no one could figure it out and requiring too much paperwork).
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
I guess they'll encourage us to own "convenient" and "unregulated" blockchain/NFT assets and securities in the Metaverse, but not "cumbersome" real world assets (eg: by complicating tax rules so much no one could figure it out and requiring too much paperwork).
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Theory:
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
For what purpose?
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
I guess they'll encourage us to own "convenient" and "unregulated" blockchain/NFT assets and securities in the Metaverse, but not "cumbersome" real world assets (eg: by complicating tax rules so much no one could figure it out and requiring too much paperwork).
Two systems. Same goal?
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us. I guess they'll encourage us to own "convenient" blockchain/NFT assets and securities in the Metaverse, but not "cumbersome" real world assets (eg: by complicating tax rules so much no one would want to figure it out).
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us. I guess they'll encourage us to own blockchain/NFT assets in the Metaverse, but no real world assets.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us. I guess they'll let us own blockchain/NFT assets in the Metaverse, but no real world assets.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us. I guess they'll let us own blockchain/NFT assets in the Metaverse, but no real world assets.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = people running the system = Je ws [whether as Bolsheviks or as the bankers]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = Je ws [running either system]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = Je ws [running either system]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = Je ws [whether in government or corporations]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.
"They" will own everything (in communism "they" = government, in this sort of capitalism "they" = corporations, and in the Talmud "they" = Je ws [whether in government or corporations]).
Methinks they are getting ready to remove vaccines as the primary defense, and promote lockdowns as the primary defense. From the POV of this theory, it was necessary to try out vaccines so the masses could see it doesn't work permanently against ever changing strains. Second, they helped identify those in government, media, military etc. who didn't take vaccines (the "resisters"/opposition).
If true, more and more of the adverse effects and inefficacy will be "officially" recognized in the coming days. Let's see if this theory is correct.
If true, the future consists of work-from-home setups, with Metaverse being the way we interact (as opposed to in person), home deliveries etc. If lockdowns continue long enough, this will normalize. Eventually this: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/welcome-to-2030-i-own-nothing-have-no-privacy-and-life-has-never-been-better-ee2eed62f710
We have access to transportation, accommodation, food and all the things we need in our daily lives. One by one all these things became free, so it ended up not making sense for us to own much.
The above quote is true for a normie. It makes little economic sense for the average normie to buy something when you have free access to it already. This is how they'll lure us.
You know what's common between Communism (left-wing) and this sort of Capitalism (right-wing)? In both cases you own nothing and are promised happiness. The two "sides" fighting over each other over which system is better.