Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

These are strawman arguments. Forgive me if I am wrong, but nobody here is proposing that the materials you keep referencing (jet fuel, burning paper, etc.) are what brought the towers down.

EDIT: The following quotation of u/DZP is badly out of context. I apologize. I misread it as only a nuke could furnish the energy to bring down superstructures like the Twin Towers when in fact the point was the vast amount of heat produced. My response to that is the research that has been done on use of thermite and how much, but I am not knowledgeable about that.

...it takes a more powerful energy source. Pretty much only a nuke could furnish that energy.

You don't believe that buildings can be pulled using non-nuclear means?

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

These are strawman arguments. Forgive me if I am wrong, but nobody here is proposing that the materials you keep referencing (jet fuel, burning paper, etc.) are what brought the towers down.

...it takes a more powerful energy source. Pretty much only a nuke could furnish that energy.

You don't believe that buildings can be pulled using non-nuclear means?

2 years ago
1 score