Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.
  1. The detected waves happened after plane crash and BEFORE collapse as a triggering energy source would.

  2. repeating ELI5: ionizing radiation is NOT thermal energy. It is X-rays, basically. Furthermore, your model is flawed. You assume all energy that was emitted was ionizing? A nuke can emit many kinds of radiation across the spectrum, depending on design parameters and adjustable values. A bomb emitting an EMP pulse can couple into metals, i.e. wires and cables, yet not touch human tissue.

  3. UV as best does not preclude absorption of other energy such as X-rays and in particular E/M waves that couple right into metal but their magnetic fields will not affect human tissue. Also we know that tissues are poor at absorbing X-ray energy, obviously medical and dental.

Your argument against evidence consistency is weak given that there are multiple pieces of evidence that are strong. Why don't you consult your rabbi on this.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original
  1. The detected waves happened after plane crash and BEFORE collapse as a triggering energy source would.

  2. repeating ELI5: ionizing radiation is NOT thermal energy. It is X-rays, basically.

  3. UV as best does not preclude absorption of other energy such as X-ray. And we know that tissues are poor at absorbing X-ray energy, obviously medical and dental.

Your argument against evidence consistency is weak given that there are multiple pieces of evidence that are strong.

2 years ago
1 score