Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out gracefully now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a real truth seeker, would be read as a positive invitation worth investigating.
As per your quote: "Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can."
Okay. So you teach that books don't have pictures and drawings?
Re: My quote "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher."
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of the current subject. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here. How did the gods and numbers and letters all get their names and how and why do they inter-correspond with ideation? What are the angels and daemons names and why is it the same with them? What's up with that?
Early Christian gnostics who saw the city's temple priests as Hellenic overseer usurpers of the priesthood and literalists as 'seekers after smooth things', the people who could write and did write the laws on copper scrolls, referred to Jesus as/ 'the plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, as OG lifelong researcher.....and discover things you never knew or maybe can even imagine.
Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Oh, one more thing. I don't subscribe as 'A gnostic' as I'm not limited to that theology's cultural expression. Not knowing which 'bucket' to ad hoc a person into, you're forced to address issues.....with informational answers to questions.....but won't, because you don't know them, and refuse to go find. Seek and ye shall find. Leave the 99 to find the One as completion.
So be it. Amen = 99/completion
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out gracefully now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a real truth seeker, would be read as a positive invitation worth investigating.
As per your quote: "Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can."
Okay. So you teach that books don't have pictures and drawings?
Re: My quote "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher."
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of the current subject. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out gracefully now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a real truth seeker, would be read as a positive invitation worth investigating.
As per your quote: "Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can."
Okay. So you teach that books don't have pictures and drawings?
Re: My quote "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher."
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out gracefully now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a real truth seeker, would be read as a positive invitation worth investigating.
As Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew. That to a truth seeker, would be an invitation worth answering, or things he already knew.
As Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. A platitude is a pretense of wisdom, not actual information that might prove or disprove. I offer information as proof, you offer platitudes. I hope you can grasp the difference and go back and confirm for yourself if you need it. 0 Facts. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept, just as most modern man doesn't truly appreciate the difference between 1 and 0 while depending on it daily. Knowledge sure is relevant. So are the words 'research' and 'study' and 'lifelong'. Statements show position to the ascendant party every single time. You don't have the tools my fren, bow out now or risk getting red-pilled with a plethora of things you never knew.
As Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. It PRETENDS to. You've given this much data/knowledge in total in your retorts. 0. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every numeric system. Somehow, certain primitives never 'got' the concept. Yes, 'knowledge is relevant.
As Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Platitudes ABOUT knowledge is not knowledge. It doesn't relay knowledge. It PRETENDS to. You've given this much data/knowledge in total in your retorts. 0. That's a zero. It didn't exist in every alphabet. Primitives didn't 'get it'.
As Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a false pretense.
Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called."
The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also.
And so one of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more :)...... and one was not.
Read the little pdf file, mr lifelong researcher.....and be enlightened. Try harder, you can get there. I would have never put it like that, but you did it first as a fraud. I mean in comparison.
Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called." The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also. One of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more (LOL) and one was not.
Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like the coat that Joseph got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology, separated him from his courser literalistic brothers and allowed him to interpret the Pharoah's dreams (see psychology)
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called." The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also. One of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more (LOL) and one was not.
Re: Well, documentaries are a better source of research than books, since books cannot deliver visual evidence as video documentaries can.
I've discovered now that books don't have pictures and drawings.
Re: "Critique that book for me and I'll consider you a teacher." My quote
A teacher. Not MY teacher. Worthy of being a teacher. A teacher. Not MY teacher. Unless of course you could indeed find fault and/or critique said book you didn't even attempt to read but will pretend it doesn't matter. Teachers don't teach through ignor-ance.
Re: " am so used to your way of thinking that my only solution is to find the fun things in it"
I don't have a 'way of thinking' and if I did, you wouldn't be 'used to it' just as you are ignorant of it now. You speak in a childish manner that should be embarrassing and will be as you go along.
I want you to give me ALL the information ABOUT gnosis that you can find, especially using gnostics as source since of course they'd know wtf they're talking about. At least some. Gnosis comes in many colors just like Josephs coat he got as reward for being able to critique his literalist cousins' theology.
How's the reading coming, pretty good?
Please help me out with this: In Greece, prior to the Christian Era, there was a word IHEOYE that translated into 'Jesus' in another language and in the system called gematria, transfigures into the number '888'. Interestingly, both the names spelling makes '888'. Questions to the teacher: Why? Why 888? Why did the Greeks have an apriory (came first) 'Jesus' in the first place? What was the Logos in Greek symbology and why did it also share the number 888? Why and how did Clement know that know that in music tuning theory, that .888 was considered both the logos/ratio of the whole tone, but also acted as the 'mediator' between the two tetrachords of the octave? Or why the 'octave' was 'the ogdoad' to the Essenic Gnostics from which came the Nazarites from which came the historic Jesus you call heretic. Yes, prior to the later Christian Era of Romish Catholic Crestianity, Clement referred in a book, not a Tik-Tok video, that the newly emerging 'Christianity' was 'The New Song' of the eternal Logos, a new spiritual expression of the pre-existing pattern of harmony upon which all of creation is based. How did he do that and what are those patterns? Help me out here.
Early Christian gnostics referred to Jesus as/ 'he plenitude of the ogdoads' or 'Fullness of the Eights'. Of that, Church Father Iraneus states, "Jesus is a name arithmetically symbolical, consisting of six letters, which known by all those that belong to the called." The ogdoad 'contained in himself the entire number of the 'elements/letters (stoicheia) which are gematric equivalents also. One of us was 'called' to discover this and 99 percent more (LOL) and one was not.