Different races and etnicities are different. Even in biochemistry. By different reasons. Even genetic.
If dark skin of negroid race is defined genetically, what make you think that differences in brain suddenly have nothing to do with genetic?
IQ measure only one aspect of human brain activity. By that measure white are better than niggers, and east asians are better than whites. If you swithch to leg length the picture will be opposite. If the latter is definitely dtermined by genetic, what make you think that former is not?
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
Israel have lower IQ (98.57) than China, Iran, Russia, Spain and even US (101.4). Israel is not much different from African countries like Algeria and Ethiopia. And suddenly similar to IQ of Jordan and Syria where their semite relatives live. How could that be? Israel have had no problems with education and kind of developed, thanks to constant US multibillion dotations. But still their IQ is not different from other semites and barely above Ephiopia populated by niggers. So, development don't have much influence on IQ. What's left? Genetics.
However, you have to take in account that IQ is only partial measure of what we assume as smartness (is there such word in English?). Not that a man with IQ 50 could be smarter than a man with IQ 120, but when IQ differ a little it could be that man with IQ 100 is smarter than a man with IQ 110.
So, IQ is not an absolute measure of smartness, only part of it, so countly with moderate IQ is not necessary doomed to be undeveloped, and IQ more depend on race and etnicity than on the level of developmant, so IQ is clearly genetically dependent.
Different races and etnicities are different. Even in biochemistry. By different reasons. Even genetic.
If dark skin of negroid race is defined genetically, what make you think that differences in brain suddenly have nothing to do with genetic?
IQ measure only one aspect of human brain activity. By that measure white are better than niggers, and east asians are better than whites. If you swithch to leg length the picture will be opposite. If the latter is definitely dtermined by genetic, what make you think that former is not?
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
Israel have lower IQ (98.57) than China, Iran, Russia, Spain and even US (101.4). Israel is not much different from African countries like Algeria and Ethiopia. And suddenly similar to IQ of Jordan and Syria where their semite relatives live. How could that be? Israel have had no problems with education and kind of developed, thanks to constant US multibillion dotations. But still their IQ is not different from other semites and barely above Ephiopia populated by niggers. So, development don't have much influence on IQ. What's left? Genetics.
However, you have to take in account that IQ is only partial measure of what we assume as smartness (is there such word in English?). Not that a man with IQ 50 could be smarter than a man with IQ 120, but when IQ differ a little it could be that man with IQ 100 is smarter than a man with IQ 110.
So, IQ is not an absolute measure of smartness, only part of it, so countly with moderate IQ is not necessary doomed to be undeveloped, and IQ more depend on race and etnicity than on the level of developmant, so IQ is clearly genetically dependent.
Different races and etnicities are different. Even in biochemistry. By different reasons. Even genetic.
If dark skin of negroid race is defined genetically, what make you think that differences in brain suddenly have nothing to do with genetic?
IQ measure only one aspect of human brain activity. By that measure white are better than niggers, and east asians are better than whites. If you swithch to leg length the picture will be opposite. If the latter is definitely dtermined by genetic, what make you think that former is not?
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
Israel have lower IQ (98.57) than China, Iran, Russia, Spain and even US (101.4). Israel is not much different from African countries like Algeria and Ethiopia. And suddenly similar to IQ of Jordan and Syria where their semite relatives live. How could that be? Israel ~have~ had no problems with education and kind of developed, thanks to constant US multibillion dotations. But still their IQ is not different from other semites and barely above Ephiopia populated by niggers. So, development don't have much influence on IQ. What's left? Genetics.
However, you have to take in account that IQ is only partial measure of what we assume as smartness (is there such word in English?). Not that a man with IQ 50 could be smarter than a man with IQ 120, but when IQ differ a little it could be that man with IQ 100 is smarter than a man with IQ 110.
So, IQ is not an absolute measure of smartness, only part of it, so countly with moderate IQ is not necessary doomed to be undeveloped, and IQ more depend on race and etnicity than on the level of developmant, so IQ is clearly genetically dependent.
Different races and etnicities are different. Even in biochemistry. By different reasons. Even genetic.
If dark skin of negroid race is defined genetically, what make you think that differences in brain suddenly have nothing to do with genetic?
IQ measure only one aspect of human brain activity. By that measure white are better than niggers, and east asians are better than whites. If you swithch to leg length the picture will be opposite. If the latter is definitely dtermined by genetic, what make you think that former is not?
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country
Israel have lower IQ (98.57) than China, Iran, Russia, Spain and even US (101.4). Israel is not much different from African countries like Algeria and Ethiopia. And suddenly similar to IQ of Jordan and Syria where their semite relatives live. How could that be? Israel hade no problems with education and kind of developed, thanks to constant US multibillion dotations. But still their IQ is not different from other semites and barely above Ephiopia populated by niggers. So, development don't have much influence on IQ. What's left? Genetics.
However, you have to take in account that IQ is only partial measure of what we assume as smartness (is there such word in English?). Not that a man with IQ 50 could be smarter than a man with IQ 120, but when IQ differ a little it could be that man with IQ 100 is smarter than a man with IQ 110.
So, IQ is not an absolute measure of smartness, only part of it, so countly with moderate IQ is not necessary doomed to be undeveloped, and IQ more depend on race and etnicity than on the level of developmant, so IQ is clearly genetically dependent.